Main Content start here
Main Layout
Report Description

Report Description

Forecast Period

2027-2031

Market Size (2025)

USD 2.11 Billion

CAGR (2026-2031)

8.17%

Fastest Growing Segment

In Vitro Testing

Largest Market

North America

Market Size (2031)

USD 3.38 Billion

Market Overview

The Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market will grow from USD 2.11 Billion in 2025 to USD 3.38 Billion by 2031 at a 8.17% CAGR. Dermal toxicity testing involves the comprehensive evaluation of substances to determine their potential to cause skin damage, such as corrosion and irritation, or systemic effects following topical application. This process is fundamental for the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and chemical sectors to ensure consumer safety and adhere to strict compliance standards. The market is primarily propelled by rigorous regulatory frameworks, such as REACH, and a growing ethical imperative to replace animal testing with alternative in vitro and in silico methods. According to the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), in 2024, the European chemical industry generated a turnover of €635 billion, indicating the substantial volume of chemical entities necessitating toxicological evaluation.

Despite these strong drivers, the market faces a significant challenge regarding the scientific validation and regulatory harmonization of alternative testing methods. Although non-animal models are advancing, demonstrating their full equivalence to complex biological systems remains a substantial hurdle, potentially delaying their universal acceptance and impeding the broader expansion of the market.

Key Market Drivers

The expansion of the global cosmetics and personal care industry serves as a primary engine for the dermal toxicity testing market, driven by the continuous introduction of novel ingredients and complex formulations that require rigorous safety evaluation. As consumer awareness regarding product safety heightens, manufacturers are compelled to conduct extensive dermal compatibility studies to prevent adverse reactions and comply with international safety standards. This surge in product development necessitates a high volume of toxicological assessments to ensure market readiness. According to Cosmetics Europe, June 2025, in the 'Annual Report 2024', the European cosmetics and personal care market generated retail sales of €104 billion in 2024, underscoring the immense scale of commercial activity that sustains the demand for safety testing services.

Simultaneously, the market is being reshaped by the rapid adoption of alternative non-animal testing methodologies, spurred by ethical concerns and evolving regulatory frameworks such as the FDA Modernization Act 2.0. This shift has accelerated the commercialization of 3D reconstructed human epidermis models, which offer higher predictive accuracy for human skin responses compared to traditional animal tests. The strategic value of these technologies is evident in recent industry moves; according to Sartorius, April 2025, in the 'Media Release: Sartorius to acquire microtissue business MatTek', the company agreed to acquire MatTek, a leader in 3D tissue models, for $80 million, reflecting the sector's high growth potential. Additionally, the reliance on specialized external expertise to navigate these modern testing landscapes continues to bolster the contract research sector. According to Charles River Laboratories, November 2025, in the 'Third-Quarter 2025 Results', the Discovery and Safety Assessment segment reported revenue of $600.7 million, highlighting the substantial ongoing investment in outsourced toxicological services.

Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

The rigorous scientific validation and regulatory harmonization of alternative testing methods present a formidable challenge to the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market. Proving that non-animal models, such as in vitro and in silico techniques, fully replicate the complex physiological responses of intact biological systems is scientifically difficult, often leading regulatory bodies to hesitate in accepting these new methodologies. This caution results in a fragmented regulatory landscape where tests accepted in one region may be rejected in another, creating significant uncertainty for service providers and their clients who must navigate differing compliance requirements.

Consequently, this lack of harmonization delays the commercial adoption of advanced alternative technologies, restricting the market's revenue potential. Manufacturers face increased compliance burdens and postponed product launches, effectively stalling the transition from traditional animal-based testing which the market aims to replace. Highlighting the economic scale at risk, Cosmetics Europe reported that in 2024, the European cosmetics and personal care market generated retail sales of €104 billion. The absence of streamlined, universally accepted validation protocols for the safety assessment of such a substantial volume of products directly constrains the dermal toxicity testing market's growth trajectory and operational efficiency.

Key Market Trends

Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Toxicology is reshaping the market by transitioning safety assessments from reactive, animal-based observations to proactive, data-driven predictions. This trend is characterized by the deployment of machine learning algorithms that analyze vast chemical libraries to forecast toxicity endpoints with unprecedented speed, prompting pharmaceutical players to operationalize these platforms for de-risking early-stage assets. For instance, according to Exscientia, October 2024, in the 'Press Release: Exscientia Achieves Milestones for Two Programmes in Sanofi Collaboration', the company received an aggregate of $15 million in milestone payments after its AI-driven platform successfully identified lead compounds meeting complex product profiles, demonstrating the commercial efficacy of computational toxicology in drug development pipelines.

Commercialization of Dermal Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms is simultaneously transforming the sector, moving beyond academic prototypes to scalable, industrially robust systems. These microphysiological devices replicate the dynamic human skin microenvironment, gaining traction as superior alternatives to static cell cultures for assessing systemic toxicity and drug absorption. The sector is witnessing substantial investment to expand manufacturing capacities for mass adoption. According to CN Bio, April 2024, in the 'Press Release: CN Bio Raises $21 Million USD in First Close of Series B Investment Round', the company secured a $21 million investment specifically to accelerate the commercial scaling of its PhysioMimix systems, highlighting the aggressive push towards physiologically relevant models in toxicological workflows.

Segmental Insights

The In Vitro Testing segment is currently witnessing the most rapid expansion within the global dermal toxicity testing market, primarily driven by the increasing global emphasis on alternative testing methods that eliminate animal usage. This growth is significantly supported by regulatory frameworks from organizations such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which have validated various non-animal test guidelines for safety assessments. Furthermore, stringent ethical regulations and bans on animal testing for cosmetics in major regions compel manufacturers to adopt these cellular-based models, ensuring compliance while maintaining rigorous safety standards for chemical and pharmaceutical products.

Regional Insights

North America holds the leading position in the global dermal toxicity testing market, driven by a robust industrial base and stringent safety regulations. This dominance is primarily attributed to the high concentration of pharmaceutical and cosmetic manufacturers that must adhere to rigorous compliance standards. Agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency enforce strict guidelines requiring comprehensive skin safety evaluations for new products. Additionally, the region demonstrates a strong commitment to adopting alternative in vitro testing methods, further supporting its established market presence.

Recent Developments

  • In November 2024, SenzaGen expanded its strategic collaboration with the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) through the receipt of two new orders for its GARDskin Dose-Response testing method. These orders, valued at approximately SEK 4.5 million, focused on utilizing the company's genomic-based testing platform for quantitative risk assessment and the evaluation of photosensitization potential. This development highlighted the increasing industry adoption of the company's non-animal testing solutions for defining safe dose levels and assessing complex endpoints in skin sensitization. The partnership underscored the capability of the GARD platform to fill critical data gaps in the safety evaluation of fragrance ingredients without relying on animal experimentation.
  • In October 2024, Cyprotex announced the expansion of its toxicology service offerings with the launch of a new Skin Sensitization Panel. This development was part of the company's broader update to its portfolio, which included diverse modality offerings and enhanced immunotoxicology services. The newly introduced panel was designed to support the safety assessment of chemicals and cosmetic ingredients by utilizing non-animal testing methods that align with regulatory standards. By integrating these advanced assays, the company aimed to provide comprehensive data on the sensitization potential of test substances, assisting clients in the pharmaceutical and consumer product sectors with early-stage hazard identification.
  • In September 2024, MatTek Life Sciences entered into a strategic licensing agreement with CellEx, a life science laboratory based in China, to expand the availability of its advanced tissue models. This collaboration authorized the Chinese partner to manufacture the company's portfolio of organotypic human tissues, including reconstructed skin models, using proprietary technology. The partnership aimed to produce these in vitro models locally, thereby enhancing supply chain efficiency and meeting the growing demand for non-animal testing solutions in the Asian market. This initiative represented a significant step in the company's global expansion, providing reliable, human-relevant tools for dermal safety assessment and pharmaceutical development in the region.
  • In June 2024, Kao Corporation achieved a major regulatory milestone when the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) updated Test Guideline 442D to include the company’s EpiSensA assay. This in vitro test method, based on a reconstructed human epidermis model, was officially recognized as a valid procedure for assessing skin sensitization hazard. The inclusion of this assay in the global testing guidelines demonstrated the scientific validity and robustness of the method for identifying potential skin allergens. This breakthrough solidified the company's contribution to the advancement of alternative testing methodologies, offering the industry a reliable tool for conducting safety assessments in compliance with international regulatory standards.

Key Market Players

  • SGS S.A.
  • Covance, Inc
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
  • Qiagen N.V.
  • GE Healthcare
  • Eurofins Scientific Inc
  • Merck KgaA
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
  • Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
  • Catalent, Inc.

By Test Type

By Testing Method Type

By End User

By Region

  • Skin Irritation Tests
  • Skin Sensitization Tests
  • In Vivo Testing (Animal-Based Tests) and In Vitro Testing (Cell-Based or Tissue-Based Tests)
  • Pharmaceuticals industries
  • Cosmetics and personal care products industry
  • Chemical Industry
  • Other
  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  • Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Test Type:
  • Skin Irritation Tests
  • Skin Sensitization Tests
  • Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Testing Method Type:
  • In Vivo Testing (Animal-Based Tests) and In Vitro Testing (Cell-Based or Tissue-Based Tests)
  • Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By End User:
  • Pharmaceuticals industries
  • Cosmetics and personal care products industry
  • Chemical Industry
  • Other
  • Dermal Toxicity Testing Market, By Region:
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • France
    • United Kingdom
    • Italy
    • Germany
    • Spain
  • Asia Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
    • South Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]

Table of content

Table of content

1.    Product Overview

1.1.  Market Definition

1.2.  Scope of the Market

1.2.1.  Markets Covered

1.2.2.  Years Considered for Study

1.2.3.  Key Market Segmentations

2.    Research Methodology

2.1.  Objective of the Study

2.2.  Baseline Methodology

2.3.  Key Industry Partners

2.4.  Major Association and Secondary Sources

2.5.  Forecasting Methodology

2.6.  Data Triangulation & Validation

2.7.  Assumptions and Limitations

3.    Executive Summary

3.1.  Overview of the Market

3.2.  Overview of Key Market Segmentations

3.3.  Overview of Key Market Players

3.4.  Overview of Key Regions/Countries

3.5.  Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4.    Voice of Customer

5.    Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

5.1.1.  By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1.  By Test Type (Skin Irritation Tests, Skin Sensitization Tests)

5.2.2.  By Testing Method Type (In Vivo Testing (Animal-Based Tests) and In Vitro Testing (Cell-Based or Tissue-Based Tests))

5.2.3.  By End User (Pharmaceuticals industries, Cosmetics and personal care products industry, Chemical Industry, Other)

5.2.4.  By Region

5.2.5.  By Company (2025)

5.3.  Market Map

6.    North America Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast

6.1.1.  By Value

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1.  By Test Type

6.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

6.2.3.  By End User

6.2.4.  By Country

6.3.    North America: Country Analysis

6.3.1.    United States Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

6.3.1.1.  Market Size & Forecast

6.3.1.1.1.  By Value

6.3.1.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.3.1.2.1.  By Test Type

6.3.1.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

6.3.1.2.3.  By End User

6.3.2.    Canada Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

6.3.2.1.  Market Size & Forecast

6.3.2.1.1.  By Value

6.3.2.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.3.2.2.1.  By Test Type

6.3.2.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

6.3.2.2.3.  By End User

6.3.3.    Mexico Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

6.3.3.1.  Market Size & Forecast

6.3.3.1.1.  By Value

6.3.3.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.3.3.2.1.  By Test Type

6.3.3.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

6.3.3.2.3.  By End User

7.    Europe Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.1.1.  By Value

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1.  By Test Type

7.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.2.3.  By End User

7.2.4.  By Country

7.3.    Europe: Country Analysis

7.3.1.    Germany Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.3.1.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.3.1.1.1.  By Value

7.3.1.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.3.1.2.1.  By Test Type

7.3.1.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.3.1.2.3.  By End User

7.3.2.    France Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.3.2.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.3.2.1.1.  By Value

7.3.2.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.3.2.2.1.  By Test Type

7.3.2.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.3.2.2.3.  By End User

7.3.3.    United Kingdom Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.3.3.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.3.3.1.1.  By Value

7.3.3.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.3.3.2.1.  By Test Type

7.3.3.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.3.3.2.3.  By End User

7.3.4.    Italy Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.3.4.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.3.4.1.1.  By Value

7.3.4.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.3.4.2.1.  By Test Type

7.3.4.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.3.4.2.3.  By End User

7.3.5.    Spain Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

7.3.5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.3.5.1.1.  By Value

7.3.5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.3.5.2.1.  By Test Type

7.3.5.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

7.3.5.2.3.  By End User

8.    Asia Pacific Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.1.1.  By Value

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1.  By Test Type

8.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.2.3.  By End User

8.2.4.  By Country

8.3.    Asia Pacific: Country Analysis

8.3.1.    China Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.3.1.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.3.1.1.1.  By Value

8.3.1.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.3.1.2.1.  By Test Type

8.3.1.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.3.1.2.3.  By End User

8.3.2.    India Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.3.2.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.3.2.1.1.  By Value

8.3.2.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.3.2.2.1.  By Test Type

8.3.2.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.3.2.2.3.  By End User

8.3.3.    Japan Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.3.3.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.3.3.1.1.  By Value

8.3.3.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.3.3.2.1.  By Test Type

8.3.3.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.3.3.2.3.  By End User

8.3.4.    South Korea Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.3.4.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.3.4.1.1.  By Value

8.3.4.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.3.4.2.1.  By Test Type

8.3.4.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.3.4.2.3.  By End User

8.3.5.    Australia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

8.3.5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.3.5.1.1.  By Value

8.3.5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.3.5.2.1.  By Test Type

8.3.5.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

8.3.5.2.3.  By End User

9.    Middle East & Africa Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast

9.1.1.  By Value

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1.  By Test Type

9.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

9.2.3.  By End User

9.2.4.  By Country

9.3.    Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis

9.3.1.    Saudi Arabia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

9.3.1.1.  Market Size & Forecast

9.3.1.1.1.  By Value

9.3.1.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.3.1.2.1.  By Test Type

9.3.1.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

9.3.1.2.3.  By End User

9.3.2.    UAE Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

9.3.2.1.  Market Size & Forecast

9.3.2.1.1.  By Value

9.3.2.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.3.2.2.1.  By Test Type

9.3.2.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

9.3.2.2.3.  By End User

9.3.3.    South Africa Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

9.3.3.1.  Market Size & Forecast

9.3.3.1.1.  By Value

9.3.3.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.3.3.2.1.  By Test Type

9.3.3.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

9.3.3.2.3.  By End User

10.    South America Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

10.1.  Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1.  By Value

10.2.  Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1.  By Test Type

10.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

10.2.3.  By End User

10.2.4.  By Country

10.3.    South America: Country Analysis

10.3.1.    Brazil Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

10.3.1.1.  Market Size & Forecast

10.3.1.1.1.  By Value

10.3.1.2.  Market Share & Forecast

10.3.1.2.1.  By Test Type

10.3.1.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

10.3.1.2.3.  By End User

10.3.2.    Colombia Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

10.3.2.1.  Market Size & Forecast

10.3.2.1.1.  By Value

10.3.2.2.  Market Share & Forecast

10.3.2.2.1.  By Test Type

10.3.2.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

10.3.2.2.3.  By End User

10.3.3.    Argentina Dermal Toxicity Testing Market Outlook

10.3.3.1.  Market Size & Forecast

10.3.3.1.1.  By Value

10.3.3.2.  Market Share & Forecast

10.3.3.2.1.  By Test Type

10.3.3.2.2.  By Testing Method Type

10.3.3.2.3.  By End User

11.    Market Dynamics

11.1.  Drivers

11.2.  Challenges

12.    Market Trends & Developments

12.1.  Merger & Acquisition (If Any)

12.2.  Product Launches (If Any)

12.3.  Recent Developments

13.    Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market: SWOT Analysis

14.    Porter's Five Forces Analysis

14.1.  Competition in the Industry

14.2.  Potential of New Entrants

14.3.  Power of Suppliers

14.4.  Power of Customers

14.5.  Threat of Substitute Products

15.    Competitive Landscape

15.1.  SGS S.A.

15.1.1.  Business Overview

15.1.2.  Products & Services

15.1.3.  Recent Developments

15.1.4.  Key Personnel

15.1.5.  SWOT Analysis

15.2.  Covance, Inc

15.3.  Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.

15.4.  Qiagen N.V.

15.5.  GE Healthcare

15.6.  Eurofins Scientific Inc

15.7.  Merck KgaA

15.8.  Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

15.9.  Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.

15.10.  Catalent, Inc.

16.    Strategic Recommendations

17.    About Us & Disclaimer

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The market size of the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market was estimated to be USD 2.11 Billion in 2025.

North America is the dominating region in the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market.

In Vitro Testing segment is the fastest growing segment in the Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market.

The Global Dermal Toxicity Testing Market is expected to grow at 8.17% between 2026 to 2031.

Related Reports

We use cookies to deliver the best possible experience on our website. To learn more, visit our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use this site or by closing this box, you consent to our use of cookies. More info.