Biological Skin Substitutes Market- Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2018-2028, Segmented By Type (Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products, Acellular Animal Derived Products, Biosynthetic Products), By Application (Chronic Wounds v/s Acute Wounds), By End User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Care Centers, Others), Region and Competition

  • Industry : Healthcare
  • Pages : NA
  • Published Date : NA
Customization Enquiry

Buy Now

Summary

Report Description

Biological Skin Substitutes market is expected to see an impressive growth during the forecast period, 2024-2028. owing to increasing incidences of chronic wounds, growing geriatric population, and increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques. The market for biological skin substitutes has experienced significant growth over the past few years and is projected to continue to do so during the forecast period. Biological skin substitutes are used to treat a wide range of wounds, including burns, diabetic foot ulcers, and surgical wounds. These substitutes can be made from a variety of materials, including animal and human tissues, synthetic materials, and combinations thereof.


One of the key drivers of growth in the biological skin substitutes market is the rising incidence of chronic wounds, particularly in aging populations. Chronic wounds are difficult to treat and often require more than traditional wound care to heal properly. Moreover, there is a growing demand for advanced wound care products that can improve healing outcomes and reduce the overall cost of care.

 

Another factor contributing to the growth of the biological skin substitutes market is the increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques. Regenerative medicine involves the use of stem cells and other biologic materials to stimulate tissue regeneration and repair. As this field continues to advance, the use of biological skin substitutes is expected to become more common.

 

The market for biological skin substitutes is also being driven by the development of new products that offer improved healing outcomes and reduced risk of complications. For example, some biological skin substitutes are designed to mimic the structure and function of natural skin, which can improve healing outcomes and reduce the risk of rejection or infection.

 

One of the challenges facing the biological skin substitutes market is the high cost of these products. While they offer significant benefits over traditional wound care methods, they can be expensive to produce and may not be covered by insurance. This can limit access to these products for patients who would benefit from them.

 

Despite these challenges, the growth for the biological skin substitutes market is positive. As the demand for advanced wound care products continues to grow, the development of new and innovative biological skin substitutes is expected to accelerate. Additionally, advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are expected to further drive growth in the market.

 

Growing use of regenerative medicine is also supporting the growth of the market. Regenerative medicine involves the use of stem cells and other biologic materials to stimulate tissue regeneration and repair. The use of regenerative medicine techniques is becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of chronic wounds, which has led to a growing demand for biological skin substitutes.

 

Moreover, there is a growing preference for biological skin substitutes made from natural materials, such as animal and human tissues. This is because these materials have a lower risk of causing adverse reactions or rejection compared to synthetic materials.

 

Additionally, the development of new technologies, such as 3D printing and tissue engineering, is driving innovation in the biological skin substitutes market. These technologies are enabling the creation of more complex and sophisticated skin substitutes that can better mimic the structure and function of natural skin.

 

In recent years, there has been a surge in product launches and developments related to biological skin substitutes, driven by the increasing demand for advanced wound care products and the growing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques.

 

Organogenesis, Inc., a leading provider of regenerative medicine solutions, launched a new version of its Apligraf product in 2021. This product is a bi-layered living cell therapy that is used to treat diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. The new version of Apligraf has been updated with a longer shelf life and enhanced handling properties, making it easier for healthcare providers to use.

 

Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, a specialty pharmaceutical company, received FDA approval for its StrataGraft® product in 2020. StrataGraft® is a regenerative skin tissue that is used to treat deep partial-thickness burns. It is made from human cells and is designed to mimic the structure and function of natural skin. This product provides a new treatment option for patients with deep partial-thickness burns who are not candidates for autografting.

 

MyOwn Medicines, a regenerative medicine company, launched its MyOwn Skin™ product in 2021. MyOwn Skin™ is a personalized skin substitute that is made using the patient's own skin cells. The product is designed to be used in the treatment of chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. This personalized approach to skin substitutes is expected to improve healing outcomes and reduce the risk of adverse reactions or rejection.

 

Increasing Adoption of Regenerative Medicine Techniques


The increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques is having a significant impact on the growth of the global biological skin substitutes market. Regenerative medicine involves the use of stem cells, growth factors, and other biologic materials to stimulate tissue regeneration and repair.

 

As the use of regenerative medicine techniques becomes more widespread, the demand for biological skin substitutes is expected to increase. These products are a key component of many regenerative medicine strategies and are often used to provide a scaffold for tissue regeneration and repair.

The growing interest in regenerative medicine techniques is leading to increased investment in research and development in the field. This is driving innovation and leading to the development of new and improved biological skin substitutes that are better able to support tissue regeneration and repair.

The adoption of regenerative medicine techniques is expected to expand the overall market for biological skin substitutes. This is because these techniques are being used to treat a wider range of conditions, including chronic wounds, burns, and reconstructive surgery.

The use of regenerative medicine techniques, including biological skin substitutes, is associated with improved healing outcomes. These products have been shown to promote tissue regeneration and repair, which can lead to faster healing times and improved functional outcomes for patients.

Regenerative medicine techniques, including the use of biological skin substitutes, are often associated with cost savings. By promoting tissue regeneration and repair, these products can reduce the need for more invasive and expensive procedures, such as skin grafts and reconstructive surgery. The increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques is having a significant impact on the growth of the global biological skin substitutes market. As these techniques become more widespread, the demand for biological skin substitutes is expected to increase, driving innovation, and expanding the overall market for these products.

 

Growing Incidences of Chronic Wounds

The growing incidence of chronic wounds is a major factor that is influencing the growth of the global biological skin substitutes market. Chronic wounds are wounds that do not heal in a timely manner and are a significant health issue worldwide. They can be caused by a variety of factors, including diabetes, poor circulation, and pressure ulcers. Biological skin substitutes are increasingly being used in the treatment of chronic wounds and are seen as a promising solution to this problem.


As the incidence of chronic wounds grows, there is an increasing demand for effective treatment options. Biological skin substitutes are one such option and are becoming more widely used as healthcare providers look for new and innovative ways to treat chronic wounds.


Advances in technology are leading to the development of new and improved biological skin substitutes that are better able to support tissue regeneration and repair. This is driving innovation in the market and leading to the development of products that are more effective at treating chronic wounds.


The growing incidence of chronic wounds is expanding the overall market for biological skin substitutes. These products are being used to treat a wider range of conditions, including pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous leg ulcers.


Biological skin substitutes have been shown to promote tissue regeneration and repair, which can lead to improved healing outcomes for patients with chronic wounds. This can lead to faster healing times and improved quality of life for patients.


The use of biological skin substitutes in the treatment of chronic wounds can lead to cost savings for healthcare providers. These products can reduce the need for more invasive and expensive procedures, such as skin grafts and reconstructive surgery.


The growing incidence of chronic wounds is a major factor that is influencing the growth of the global biological skin substitutes market. As the demand for effective treatment options grows, healthcare providers are increasingly turning to biological skin substitutes as a promising solution.



Download Free Sample Report 


Market Segmentation


Global Biological Skin Substitutes market can be segmented on the basis of type, application, end user and region. Based on type, the market can be further divided into human donor tissue-derived products, acellular animal derived products, and biosynthetic products. Based on application, the market is further bifurcated into chronic wounds and acute wounds. Based on end user, the market is divided into hospitals & clinics, ambulatory care centers, and others.  On the basis of region, the market is divided into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, and Middle East & Africa.

 

Market Players

Smith & Nephew, plc, 3M Company, Organogenesis, Inc., Stratatech Corporation, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Tissue Regenix Group, Mimedx Group are some of the leading players operating in the global Biological Skin Substitutes market.

 

Attribute

Details

Base Year

2022

Historic Data

2018 – 2021

Estimated Year

2023

Forecast Period

2024 – 2028

Quantitative Units

Revenue in USD Million, and CAGR for 2018-2022 and 2023-2028

Report coverage

Revenue forecast, volume forecast, company share, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends

Segments covered

By Type

By Application

By End User

Regional scope

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, Middle East & Africa

Key companies profiled

Smith & Nephew, plc, 3M Company, Organogenesis, Inc., Stratatech Corporation, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Tissue Regenix Group, Mimedx Group

Customization scope

10% free report customization with purchase. Addition or alteration to country, regional & segment scope.

Pricing and purchase options

Avail customized purchase options to meet your exact research needs. Explore purchase options

Delivery Format

PDF and Excel through Email (We can also provide the editable version of the report in PPT/Word format on special request)

 

Report Scope:

In this report, global Biological Skin Substitutes market has been segmented into following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  • Biological Skin Substitutes Market, By Type:

o      Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products

o      Acellular Animal Derived Products

o      Biosynthetic Products

  • Biological Skin Substitutes Market, By Application:

o      Chronic Wounds

o      Acute Wounds

  • Biological Skin Substitutes Market, By End User:

o      Hospitals & Clinics

o      Ambulatory Care Centers

o      Others

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market.

Available Customizations:

With the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to a company’s specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).
Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]

Table of content

1.    Product Overview

1.1.  Market Definition

1.2.  Scope of the Market

1.2.1.     Markets Covered

1.2.2.     Years Considered for Study

1.2.3.     Key Market Segmentations

2.    Research Methodology

2.1.  Objective of the Study

2.2.  Baseline Methodology

2.3.  Key Industry Partners

2.4.  Major Association and Secondary Sources

2.5.  Forecasting Methodology

2.6.  Data Triangulation & Validations

2.7.  Assumptions and Limitations

3.    Executive Summary

3.1.  Overview of the Market

3.2.  Overview of Key Market Segmentations

3.3.  Overview of Key Market Players

3.4.  Overview of Key Regions/Countries

3.5.  Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4.    Voice of Customer

5.    Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

5.1.1.     By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1.     By Type (Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products, Acellular Animal Derived Products, Biosynthetic Products)

5.2.2.     By Application (Chronic Wounds v/s Acute Wounds)

5.2.3.     By End User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Care Centers, Others)

5.2.4.     By Region

5.2.5.     By Company (2022)

5.3.  Product Map

5.3.1.     By Type

5.3.2.     By Application

5.3.3.     By End User

5.3.4.     By Region

6.    North America Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

6.1.1.     By Value

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1.     By Type

6.2.2.     By Application

6.2.3.     By End User

6.2.4.     By Country

6.3.  North America: Country Analysis

6.3.1.     United States Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

6.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.1.1.1.             By Value

6.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.1.2.1.             By Type

6.3.1.2.2.             By Application

6.3.1.2.3.             By End User

6.3.2.     Canada Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

6.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.2.1.1.             By Value

6.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.2.2.1.             By Type

6.3.2.2.2.             By Application

6.3.2.2.3.             By End User

6.3.3.     Mexico Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

6.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.3.1.1.             By Value

6.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.3.2.1.             By Type

6.3.3.2.2.             By Application

6.3.3.2.3.             By End User

7.    Europe Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

7.1.1.     By Value

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1.     By Type

7.2.2.     By Application

7.2.3.     By End User

7.2.4.     By Country

7.3.  Europe: Country Analysis

7.3.1.     France Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.1.1.1.             By Value

7.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.1.2.1.             By Type

7.3.1.2.2.             By Application

7.3.1.2.3.             By End User

7.3.2.     Germany Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.2.1.1.             By Value

7.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.2.2.1.             By Type

7.3.2.2.2.             By Application

7.3.2.2.3.             By End User

7.3.3.     United Kingdom Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.3.1.1.             By Value

7.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecasty

7.3.3.2.1.             By Type

7.3.3.2.2.             By Application

7.3.3.2.3.             By End User

7.3.4.     Italy Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.3.4.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.4.1.1.             By Value

7.3.4.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.4.2.1.             By Type

7.3.4.2.2.             By Application

7.3.4.2.3.             By End User

7.3.5.     Spain Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

7.3.5.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.5.1.1.             By Value

7.3.5.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.5.2.1.             By Type

7.3.5.2.2.             By Application

7.3.5.2.3.             By End User

8.    Asia-Pacific Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

8.1.1.     By Value

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1.     By Type

8.2.2.     By Application

8.2.3.     By End User

8.2.4.     By Country

8.3.  Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis

8.3.1.     China Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.1.1.1.             By Value

8.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.1.2.1.             By Type

8.3.1.2.2.             By Application

8.3.1.2.3.             By End User

8.3.2.     India Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.2.1.1.             By Value

8.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.2.2.1.             By Type

8.3.2.2.2.             By Application

8.3.2.2.3.             By End User

8.3.3.     Japan Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.3.1.1.             By Value

8.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.3.2.1.             By Type

8.3.3.2.2.             By Application

8.3.3.2.3.             By End User

8.3.4.     South Korea Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.3.4.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.4.1.1.             By Value

8.3.4.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.4.2.1.             By Type

8.3.4.2.2.             By Application

8.3.4.2.3.             By End User

8.3.5.     Australia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

8.3.5.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.5.1.1.             By Value

8.3.5.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.5.2.1.             By Type

8.3.5.2.2.             By Application

8.3.5.2.3.             By End User

9.    South America Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

9.1.1.     By Value

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1.     By Type

9.2.2.     By Application

9.2.3.     By End User

9.2.4.     By Country

9.3.  South America: Country Analysis

9.3.1.     Brazil Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

9.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.1.1.1.             By Value

9.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.1.2.1.             By Type

9.3.1.2.2.             By Application

9.3.1.2.3.             By End User

9.3.2.     Argentina Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

9.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.2.1.1.             By Value

9.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.2.2.1.             By Type

9.3.2.2.2.             By Application

9.3.2.2.3.             By End User

9.3.3.     Colombia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

9.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.3.1.1.             By Value

9.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.3.2.1.             By Type

9.3.3.2.2.             By Application

9.3.3.2.3.             By End User

10.  Middle East and Africa Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

10.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1.  By Value

10.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1.  By Type

10.2.2.  By Application

10.2.3.  By End User

10.2.4.  By Country

10.3.              MEA: Country Analysis

10.3.1.  South Africa Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

10.3.1.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.1.1.1.           By Value

10.3.1.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.1.2.1.           By Type

10.3.1.2.2.           By Application

10.3.1.2.3.           By End User

10.3.2.  Saudi Arabia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

10.3.2.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.2.1.1.           By Value

10.3.2.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.2.2.1.           By Type

10.3.2.2.2.           By Application

10.3.2.2.3.           By End User

10.3.3.  UAE Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook

10.3.3.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.3.1.1.           By Value

10.3.3.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.3.2.1.           By Type

10.3.3.2.2.           By Application

10.3.3.2.3.           By End User

11.  Market Dynamics

11.1.              Drivers

11.2.              Challenges

12.  Market Trends & Developments

12.1.              Recent Development

12.2.              Mergers & Acquisitions

12.3.              Type Launches

13.  Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market: SWOT Analysis

14.  Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

14.1.              Competition in the Industry

14.2.              Potential of New Entrants

14.3.              Power of Suppliers

14.4.              Power of Customers

14.5.              Threat of Substitute Types

15.  Competitive Landscape

15.1.              Business Overview

15.2.              Type Offerings

15.3.              Recent Developments

15.4.              Key Personnel

15.5.              SWOT Analysis

15.5.1.  Smith & Nephew, plc

15.5.2.  3M Company

15.5.3.  Organogenesis, Inc.

15.5.4.  Stratatech Corporation

15.5.5.  Integra LifeSciences Corporation

15.5.6.  Tissue Regenix Group

15.5.7.  Mimedx Group

16.   Strategic Recommendations

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

down-arrow

Increasing incidences of chronic wounds, growing geriatric population, and increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques are some of the factors driving the growth of global Biological Skin Substitutes market.

down-arrow

Smith & Nephew, plc, 3M Company, Organogenesis, Inc., Stratatech Corporation, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Tissue Regenix Group, Mimedx Group are some of the leading players operating in the global Biological Skin Substitutes market.

down-arrow

Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products are expected to dominate the market of Biological Skin Substitutes because they have a lower risk of causing an immune response or rejection compared to other types of biological skin substitutes.

down-arrow

High cost of product, regulatory issues, lack of awareness, and competition from alternative treatment modalities are the challenges the global Biological Skin Substitutes market will face in coming years.

Related Reports

profile

Sakshi Bajaal

Business Consultant
Press Release

Biological Skin Substitutes Market to be Dominated by the Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products through 2028

Aug, 2023

Increasing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques and rising incidences of chronic wounds is expected to drive the growth of global Biological Skin Substitutes market during the forecast period

Why Choose Us