Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle), By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine), By Region, By Competition, 2019-2029F

  • Industry : Healthcare
  • Pages : NA
  • Published Date : NA
Customization Enquiry

Buy Now

Summary

Report Description

Forecast Period

2025-2029

Market Size (2023)

USD 1.10 Billion

CAGR (2024-2029)

5.89 %

Fastest Growing Segment

Solid Microneedle

Largest Market

North America

Market Size (2029)

USD 1.54 Billion

 

Market Overview

Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market was valued at USD 1.10 Billion in 2023 and is anticipated to grow with a CAGR of 5.89% through 2029.

Clinical trials play a pivotal role in the pharmaceutical industry's quest to develop safe and effective drugs. Among the innovative drug delivery methods gaining prominence is the use of transdermal patches, which have demonstrated efficacy in combating viral infections and influenza. Transdermal drug delivery leverages passive diffusion to administer drugs through the skin, offering several advantages over conventional oral or injectable routes. Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly investing in the development of transdermal delivery systems, employing various mechanisms such as iontophoresis and sonophoresis to enhance drug absorption. These systems offer controlled and sustained release of medications, improving patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, transdermal delivery is particularly advantageous for delivering large ionic and hydrophilic drug molecules, which may pose challenges for other administration routes.

Microneedle technology represents a significant advancement in transdermal drug delivery, especially in the realm of vaccination. Microneedles, composed of biocompatible materials, are designed to penetrate the skin's outer layers painlessly, facilitating precise drug delivery into the intradermal space. This region, rich in immune cells, offers an ideal site for vaccine administration, potentially enhancing immune response and efficacy. Microneedle patches serve as a noninvasive and self-applicable alternative to conventional vaccination methods, eliminating the need for hypodermic needles and trained medical personnel. These patches are engineered to deliver vaccines safely and efficiently, offering benefits such as reduced needle phobia, minimized risk of needle-stick injuries, and simplified administration in resource-limited settings. Microneedle patches hold promise for enhancing vaccine coverage and compliance, particularly in pediatric and geriatric populations.

The versatility of microneedle technology extends beyond vaccination to encompass drug delivery for various therapeutic purposes. Microneedles can be tailored in terms of size, shape, and function to accommodate different drug formulations and administration requirements. This flexibility enables precise control over drug release kinetics and dosage, optimizing therapeutic outcomes while minimizing side effects. The development of microneedle patches underscores ongoing efforts to advance patient-centric healthcare solutions. By offering a convenient and pain-free alternative to traditional injection methods, microneedle technology has the potential to revolutionize drug delivery, especially in fields such as infectious disease management and chronic condition treatment.

Transdermal drug delivery, facilitated by transdermal patches and microneedle technology, represents a significant paradigm shift in pharmaceutical innovation. These approaches offer safer, more efficient, and patient-friendly alternatives to conventional drug administration methods, driving progress towards achieving better healthcare outcomes globally. As research and development in this field continue to evolve, the future of transdermal drug delivery holds immense promise for addressing diverse medical challenges and improving patient care.

Key Market Drivers

Rising Demand for Efficient Vaccine Delivery

Microneedles are designed to deliver vaccines directly into the dermal layer of the skin, where immune cells are more concentrated. This targeted delivery can result in a stronger and quicker immune response compared to traditional intramuscular injections. Enhanced vaccine efficacy is a significant selling point for microneedle-based flu vaccines, attracting both healthcare providers and patients. Traditional needle-based vaccinations can be associated with pain, fear, and discomfort, which can deter individuals from getting vaccinated, especially children and those with needle phobias. Microneedles offer a virtually painless and less intimidating option, increasing patient acceptance. This, in turn, can lead to higher vaccination rates, which is crucial for achieving herd immunity and reducing the spread of flu.

The simplicity and user-friendliness of microneedle-based vaccines make them suitable for self-administration, under proper guidance. This potential for self-vaccination empowers individuals to take control of their health, reducing the burden on healthcare systems and increasing vaccination coverage, particularly in remote or underserved areas. Efficient vaccine delivery through microneedles can streamline vaccination processes at healthcare facilities. The ease of administration may lead to shorter clinic visits, lower healthcare personnel requirements, and reduced costs associated with vaccination programs, thereby easing the burden on healthcare systems and increasing the accessibility of flu vaccines.

In the event of influenza pandemics or outbreaks, rapid and efficient vaccine distribution is crucial. Microneedle-based vaccines can be administered more quickly and easily than traditional injections, allowing for a faster response to emerging threats and better containment of infectious diseases. This is particularly relevant in pandemic scenarios, where timely vaccination can save lives. Some microneedle vaccine formulations are more stable at higher temperatures, reducing the need for extensive cold chain logistics. This characteristic not only simplifies storage and transportation but also makes vaccines more accessible in regions with limited access to refrigeration infrastructure, contributing to global vaccine equity.

Increased Patient Acceptance

Traditional needle-based flu vaccinations can be intimidating and uncomfortable for some individuals, including children and those with needle phobias. Microneedle flu vaccines, known for their painless and less intimidating nature, are more likely to be accepted by a broader demographic of patients. This expanded reach can result in higher vaccination rates, which are essential for achieving herd immunity and reducing the spread of influenza. Patients who are more accepting of microneedle-based flu vaccines are more likely to comply with their vaccination schedules. This increased compliance ensures that individuals receive the necessary doses and boosts, further strengthening their immunity against the flu. Higher compliance rates can contribute to better overall public health outcomes.

Vaccine hesitancy, characterized by reluctance or refusal to vaccinate, is a significant public health concern. Microneedle flu vaccines, with their less intimidating and painful administration, have the potential to mitigate vaccine hesitancy by making vaccinations more appealing to individuals who may have reservations about traditional needles. Lowering vaccine hesitancy rates can lead to higher vaccination coverage. Parents often make vaccination decisions for their children, and their acceptance of a vaccine greatly influences whether their children receive it. Microneedle flu vaccines are more likely to be accepted by parents who are concerned about their children's comfort and well-being during vaccination. This can lead to higher vaccination rates among pediatric populations.

When patients have a positive and painless experience with microneedle-based flu vaccines, it can boost their overall confidence in vaccination. This confidence can extend to other vaccines and preventive measures, contributing to a broader public health benefit by encouraging individuals to stay up-to-date with their immunizations. Some microneedle flu vaccines are designed for self-administration under proper guidance. This empowers individuals to take control of their health and vaccination schedules, reducing the need for healthcare provider involvement. Self-administration is particularly appealing in situations where access to healthcare professionals is limited, leading to increased acceptance and accessibility.

Growing Research and Investment

Increased research and investment lead to continuous technological advancements in microneedle design, fabrication, and formulation. This results in the development of more efficient and effective microneedle-based flu vaccines. These advancements can include innovations in materials, manufacturing processes, and vaccine formulations, enhancing the overall product quality. Research and investment encourage the expansion of the types of vaccines that can be delivered using microneedles. Initially used for influenza vaccines, microneedle technology is being explored for other vaccines, such as those for measles, polio, and COVID-19. A diversified vaccine portfolio expands the market's scope and potential, driving growth.

Increased research efforts lead to more comprehensive clinical trials and studies, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of microneedle-based flu vaccines. Positive clinical results help build trust among healthcare professionals and patients, leading to wider adoption and acceptance of microneedle technology. Robust research and investment support the generation of data necessary for regulatory submissions. Meeting regulatory requirements and obtaining approvals from health authorities validate the safety and effectiveness of microneedle flu vaccines, paving the way for their commercialization and widespread use.

Investments in research can lead to improvements in the scalability and cost-effectiveness of microneedle production. This reduction in manufacturing costs can make microneedle vaccines more competitive with traditional vaccination methods, driving market growth. Research and investment initiatives often involve collaborations between pharmaceutical companies, research institutions, and governments. These collaborations can facilitate the global expansion of microneedle vaccine technology, making it more accessible in various regions and healthcare settings.



Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

Regulatory Approval and Standardization

Regulatory bodies, such as the FDA in the United States and the EMA in Europe, have stringent requirements for approving new medical technologies, including microneedle-based vaccines. The process of gaining regulatory approval involves extensive preclinical and clinical testing to ensure safety and efficacy. This can be time-consuming and costly, delaying the market entry of microneedle flu vaccines. The uncertainty surrounding regulatory approval timelines can make it difficult for companies to plan their market strategies effectively. Delays in approval can result in increased development costs and missed opportunities in the competitive vaccine market.

Regulatory approval is not guaranteed, and microneedle vaccine candidates may face rejections or requests for additional data, further extending the approval process. Such setbacks can erode investor confidence and limit funding for continued development. Standardizing the manufacturing processes and quality control measures for microneedle devices is essential for meeting regulatory requirements. However, microneedle technology is still evolving, and there may not be well-established industry standards or guidelines, making standardization a challenging task.

Regulatory bodies may not have clear and specific guidelines for microneedle-based vaccines, as they do for traditional needle-based vaccines. This lack of clarity can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in the approval process, potentially delaying market entry. Microneedle designs can vary widely between manufacturers, making it difficult for regulators to establish universal standards. Each design may require its own set of validation and quality control measures, increasing complexity and regulatory scrutiny.

 

High Initial Costs

Developing microneedle technology for vaccine delivery involves substantial research and development (R&D) expenditures. This includes designing and refining microneedle devices, conducting preclinical and clinical trials, and optimizing vaccine formulations for microneedle delivery. These R&D costs can be prohibitive for smaller companies and startups, limiting their ability to enter the market. Clinical trials are a crucial part of gaining regulatory approval for microneedle-based flu vaccines. These trials require significant financial resources to recruit participants, monitor their health, collect data, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. The cost of conducting these trials can be a major barrier to market entry.

Establishing manufacturing capabilities for microneedle devices and vaccines can be expensive. Specialized equipment and cleanroom facilities are often required to produce microneedle patches at the necessary scale and quality. The initial investment in infrastructure and production facilities can be daunting. Ensuring the consistency and reliability of microneedle devices and vaccine formulations is crucial for regulatory approval and market success. Implementing robust quality control measures and validation processes adds to the initial costs, as does the need for skilled personnel to manage these aspects.

The process of gaining regulatory approval for a new medical technology, such as microneedle-based vaccines, involves extensive documentation, testing, and engagement with regulatory authorities. These activities come with their own set of costs, including fees for regulatory submissions and expert consultations. Launching a new product in the healthcare sector requires investment in marketing, distribution networks, and sales efforts. Establishing market presence and persuading healthcare providers and consumers to adopt microneedle flu vaccines can be resource intensive.

Key Market Trends

Expansion of Vaccine Portfolio

Expanding the vaccine portfolio beyond seasonal influenza vaccines opens up new revenue streams for manufacturers and developers in the microneedle vaccine market. This diversification reduces dependency on a single vaccine type and provides stability in terms of revenue generation. A broader vaccine portfolio increases the market potential for microneedle-based vaccination technology. By addressing a wider range of diseases, such as measles, polio, and COVID-19, microneedle flu vaccine manufacturers can tap into larger patient populations and address a more comprehensive set of public health needs.

Companies that offer a diverse range of microneedle-based vaccines gain a competitive advantage. A comprehensive portfolio positions these companies as leaders in the microneedle vaccine market, attracting greater attention from healthcare providers, governments, and investors. Expanding the vaccine portfolio with vaccines for different diseases contributes to improved public health outcomes. Microneedle technology can play a critical role in delivering vaccines to prevent various diseases, ultimately reducing morbidity and mortality rates globally.

A diverse vaccine portfolio allows companies to cross-promote and create synergies between different vaccine products. This can lead to more efficient marketing and distribution strategies, as well as potential cost savings in research and development. As new infectious diseases and health threats emerge, a diversified vaccine portfolio equipped with microneedle technology provides the flexibility to adapt quickly and respond to emerging public health crises. This adaptability can be particularly valuable during pandemics or disease outbreaks.

Self-Administered Vaccinations

Self-administered microneedle flu vaccines empower individuals to take control of their own vaccination schedules. This convenience makes it easier for people to get vaccinated without having to visit healthcare facilities, resulting in increased vaccination rates and broader coverage. By enabling individuals to self-administer vaccines, the burden on healthcare facilities and professionals is significantly reduced. This can alleviate overcrowding during vaccination seasons, streamline healthcare operations, and free up resources for more critical medical needs. Many individuals, including those with needle phobias or anxiety about medical procedures, may be more accepting of self-administered microneedle vaccines. The reduced fear and discomfort associated with microneedle technology can lead to higher vaccination rates, particularly among vaccine-hesitant populations.

Self-administered microneedle vaccines are well-suited for use in remote or underserved areas where access to healthcare facilities may be limited. This technology can help bridge geographical barriers and ensure that even remote populations have access to influenza vaccination. During influenza pandemics or public health emergencies, self-administered microneedle vaccines can be distributed more rapidly and efficiently. Individuals can receive vaccines in their homes or at distribution centers, minimizing the need for crowded vaccination clinics and reducing the risk of disease transmission. Self-administered vaccinations can reduce the costs associated with vaccination programs. Fewer healthcare professionals are needed for vaccine administration, and the absence of clinical visits can result in cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems.

Segmental Insights

Product Type Insights

Based on the Product Type, the Solid Microneedle segment is anticipated to witness fastest market growth rate throughout the forecast period. Solid microneedles are typically made of biocompatible materials and are designed to be painless when applied to the skin. This painless and minimally invasive nature makes them highly acceptable to patients, resulting in improved vaccination compliance and convenience. Solid microneedles are capable of delivering vaccines directly into the skin's dermal layer, which contains a high concentration of immune cells. This targeted delivery can enhance the immune response to the vaccine, potentially improving vaccine efficacy compared to traditional intramuscular injections. Solid microneedles are often designed for self-administration, reducing the need for healthcare professionals to administer vaccines. This reduction in healthcare personnel requirements can lead to cost savings and improved healthcare system efficiency.

Solid microneedles can be used to deliver vaccines without the need for cold chain storage and skilled healthcare providers, making them particularly suitable for use in low-resource settings and remote areas. This expands vaccine access to underserved populations. Solid microneedles can be distributed more easily than traditional liquid vaccines that require refrigeration. This simplifies the logistics of vaccine distribution, especially in regions with limited access to cold storage infrastructure. The stability of solid microneedle vaccines at higher temperatures can reduce vaccine wastage, as they are less susceptible to temperature fluctuations during transportation and storage.

Vaccine Type Insights

Based on the Vaccine Type segment, the Trivalent Flu Vaccine segment has been the dominant force in the market. Trivalent flu vaccines, which protect against three different flu virus strains (typically two influenza A strains and one influenza B strain), represent a substantial portion of the annual flu vaccine market. By developing microneedle delivery methods specifically for trivalent flu vaccines, companies can tap into a well-established market segment and gain a competitive edge. Trivalent flu vaccines are formulated to provide protection against the most prevalent flu strains expected to circulate during a given flu season. Microneedle technology can be customized to optimize the delivery of these specific vaccine components, potentially enhancing the immune response and efficacy of the trivalent vaccine.

Trivalent flu vaccines delivered through microneedles can offer a painless and convenient alternative to traditional injections, making them more appealing to patients. This improved patient acceptance can contribute to higher vaccination rates and a broader adoption of microneedle-based flu vaccines. The demand for trivalent flu vaccines is seasonal and peaks during flu seasons. Developing microneedle delivery systems tailored for trivalent vaccines can help companies align their products with the cyclical nature of flu vaccination, ensuring a steady revenue stream. The compatibility of microneedle technology with trivalent flu vaccines makes it easier for pharmaceutical companies to integrate this delivery method into their existing vaccine manufacturing processes. This compatibility facilitates a smoother transition to microneedle-based trivalent flu vaccines. Trivalent flu vaccines are crucial for reducing the burden of seasonal influenza and its associated complications. Microneedle-based delivery methods can enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of these vaccines, potentially leading to better public health outcomes.


Download Free Sample Report

Regional Insights

North America, specifically the Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market, dominated the market in 2023, primarily due to North America boasts a well-developed and advanced healthcare infrastructure, which provides a conducive environment for the development, manufacturing, and distribution of microneedle-based flu vaccines. The region's robust healthcare system supports research, clinical trials, and regulatory approvals, facilitating market growth. North America is a global leader in medical research and innovation. The presence of numerous research institutions, universities, and pharmaceutical companies in the region fosters continuous advancements in microneedle technology and flu vaccine development. This innovative ecosystem accelerates the growth of the microneedle flu vaccine market.

North American pharmaceutical companies often form strategic alliances and partnerships with research organizations, government agencies, and healthcare providers. These collaborations drive research funding and facilitate the development of novel microneedle-based flu vaccines, boosting market growth. North America represents one of the largest healthcare markets globally. The substantial patient population and healthcare expenditure in the region create a significant market opportunity for microneedle-based flu vaccines, attracting investment and market players.

North America has well-established regulatory agencies, including the FDA in the United States and Health Canada. These agencies provide clear guidelines for the approval of medical technologies, including microneedle-based vaccines. Compliance with regulatory requirements in North America is crucial for market entry and growth. North American consumers are generally well-informed about healthcare innovations. The region's population tends to be receptive to new vaccination technologies, including microneedles, which can lead to higher acceptance rates and market adoption.

Recent Developments

  • In November 2022, Micron Biomedical, Inc. secured USD 14 million in Series A financing to support the company’s commercial manufacturing development and establish a strong partnership between Micron and LTS Lohmann. Micron’s development pipeline includes vaccine and drug products partnered with pharma companies, foundations, and government agencies.
  • In April 2022, Vaxess Technologies, Inc., an innovative life sciences company developing a pipeline of shelf-stable and simple-to-apply vaccines, announced the production of the first GMP batch of MIMIX Technology Vaccine Patches for an upcoming Phase I seasonal influenza clinical trial.

Key Market Players

  • Debiotech S.A
  • NanoPass Technologies Limited
  • Becton, Dickinson and Company
  • FluGen, Inc
  • CosMED Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd
  • Microdermics Inc.
  • TSRL Inc
  • Vaxess Technologies Inc.
  • PFIZER, INC.
  • MERCK & CO., INC.

 

 By Product Type

By Vaccine Type

By Region
  • Solid Microneedle
  • Hollow Microneedle
  • Trivalent Flu Vaccine
  • Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine
  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

 

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  • Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market, By Product Type:

o   Solid Microneedle

o   Hollow Microneedle

  • Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market, By Vaccine Type:

o   Trivalent Flu Vaccine

o   Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine

  • Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market, By Region:

o   North America

§  United States

§  Canada

§  Mexico

o   Europe

§  France

§  United Kingdom

§  Italy

§  Germany

§  Spain

o   Asia-Pacific

§  China

§  India

§  Japan

§  Australia

§  South Korea

o   South America

§  Brazil

§  Argentina

§  Colombia

o   Middle East & Africa

§  South Africa

§  Saudi Arabia

§  UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]               

Table of content

1.    Product Overview

1.1.  Market Definition

1.2.  Scope of the Market

1.2.1.     Markets Covered

1.2.2.     Years Considered for Study

1.2.3.     Key Market Segmentations

2.    Research Methodology

2.1.  Objective of the Study

2.2.  Baseline Methodology

2.3.  Key Industry Partners

2.4.  Major Association and Secondary Sources

2.5.  Forecasting Methodology

2.6.  Data Triangulation & Validation

2.7.  Assumptions and Limitations

3.    Executive Summary

3.1.  Overview of the Market

3.2.  Overview of Key Market Segmentations

3.3.  Overview of Key Market Players

3.4.  Overview of Key Regions/Countries

3.5.  Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends

4.    Voice of Customer

5.    Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

5.1.1.     By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1.     By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

5.2.2.     By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

5.2.3.     By Region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, Middle East & Africa)

5.2.4.     By Company (2023)

5.3.  Market Map

6.    North America Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

6.1.1.     By Value

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1.     By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

6.2.2.     By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

6.2.3.     By Country

6.3.  North America: Country Analysis

6.3.1.     United States Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

6.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.1.1.1.             By Value

6.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.1.2.1.             By Product Type

6.3.1.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

6.3.2.     Canada Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

6.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.2.1.1.             By Value

6.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.2.2.1.             By Product Type

6.3.2.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

6.3.3.     Mexico Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

6.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

6.3.3.1.1.             By Value

6.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

6.3.3.2.1.             By Product Type

6.3.3.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

7.    Europe Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

7.1.1.     By Value

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1.     By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

7.2.2.     By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

7.2.3.     By Country

7.3.  Europe: Country Analysis

7.3.1.     France Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.1.1.1.             By Value

7.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.1.2.1.             By Product Type

7.3.1.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

7.3.2.     Germany Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.2.1.1.             By Value

7.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.2.2.1.             By Product Type

7.3.2.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

7.3.3.     United Kingdom Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.3.1.1.             By Value

7.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.3.2.1.             By Product Type

7.3.3.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

7.3.4.     Italy Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.3.4.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.4.1.1.             By Value

7.3.4.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.4.2.1.             By Product Type

7.3.4.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

7.3.5.     Spain Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

7.3.5.1.         Market Size & Forecast

7.3.5.1.1.             By Value

7.3.5.2.         Market Share & Forecast

7.3.5.2.1.             By Product Type

7.3.5.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

8.    Asia-Pacific Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

8.1.1.     By Value

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1.     By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

8.2.2.     By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

8.2.3.     By Country

8.3.  Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis

8.3.1.     China Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.1.1.1.             By Value

8.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.1.2.1.             By Product Type

8.3.1.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

8.3.2.     India Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.2.1.1.             By Value

8.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.2.2.1.             By Product Type

8.3.2.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

8.3.3.     Japan Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.3.1.1.             By Value

8.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.3.2.1.             By Product Type

8.3.3.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

8.3.4.     South Korea Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.3.4.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.4.1.1.             By Value

8.3.4.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.4.2.1.             By Product Type

8.3.4.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

8.3.5.     Australia Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

8.3.5.1.         Market Size & Forecast

8.3.5.1.1.             By Value

8.3.5.2.         Market Share & Forecast

8.3.5.2.1.             By Product Type

8.3.5.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

9.    South America Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast          

9.1.1.     By Value

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1.     By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

9.2.2.     By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

9.2.3.     By Country

9.3.  South America: Country Analysis

9.3.1.     Brazil Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

9.3.1.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.1.1.1.             By Value

9.3.1.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.1.2.1.             By Product Type

9.3.1.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

9.3.2.     Argentina Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

9.3.2.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.2.1.1.             By Value

9.3.2.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.2.2.1.             By Product Type

9.3.2.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

9.3.3.     Colombia Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

9.3.3.1.         Market Size & Forecast

9.3.3.1.1.             By Value

9.3.3.2.         Market Share & Forecast

9.3.3.2.1.             By Product Type

9.3.3.2.2.             By Vaccine Type

10.  Middle East and Africa Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

10.1.              Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1.   By Value

10.2.              Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1.   By Product Type (Solid Microneedle, Hollow Microneedle)

10.2.2.   By Vaccine Type (Trivalent Flu Vaccine, Quadrivalent Flu Vaccine)

10.2.3.   By Country

10.3.              MEA: Country Analysis

10.3.1.   South Africa Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

10.3.1.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.1.1.1.           By Value

10.3.1.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.1.2.1.           By Product Type

10.3.1.2.2.           By Vaccine Type

10.3.2.   Saudi Arabia Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

10.3.2.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.2.1.1.           By Value

10.3.2.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.2.2.1.           By Product Type

10.3.2.2.2.           By Vaccine Type

10.3.3.   UAE Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market Outlook

10.3.3.1.      Market Size & Forecast

10.3.3.1.1.           By Value

10.3.3.2.      Market Share & Forecast

10.3.3.2.1.           By Product Type

10.3.3.2.2.           By Vaccine Type

11.  Market Dynamics

11.1.              Drivers

11.2.              Challenges

12.  Market Trends & Developments

12.1.              Recent Development

12.2.              Mergers & Acquisitions

12.3.              Product Launches

13.  Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market: SWOT Analysis

14.  Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

14.1.              Competition in the Industry

14.2.              Potential of New Entrants

14.3.              Power of Suppliers

14.4.              Power of Customers

14.5.              Threat of Substitute Products

15.  Competitive Landscape

15.1.              Debiotech S.A

15.1.1.   Business Overview

15.1.2.   Product Offerings

15.1.3.   Recent Developments

15.1.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.1.5.   Key Personnel

15.1.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.2.              NanoPass Technologies Limited

15.2.1.   Business Overview

15.2.2.   Product Offerings

15.2.3.   Recent Developments

15.2.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.2.5.   Key Personnel

15.2.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.3.              Becton, Dickinson and Company

15.3.1.   Business Overview

15.3.2.   Product Offerings

15.3.3.   Recent Developments

15.3.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.3.5.   Key Personnel

15.3.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.4.              FluGen, Inc

15.4.1.   Business Overview

15.4.2.   Product Offerings

15.4.3.   Recent Developments

15.4.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.4.5.   Key Personnel

15.4.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.5.              CosMED Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd

15.5.1.   Business Overview

15.5.2.   Product Offerings

15.5.3.   Recent Developments

15.5.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.5.5.   Key Personnel

15.5.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.6.              Microdermics Inc.

15.6.1.   Business Overview

15.6.2.   Product Offerings

15.6.3.   Recent Developments

15.6.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.6.5.   Key Personnel

15.6.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.7.              TSRL Inc.

15.7.1.   Business Overview

15.7.2.   Product Offerings

15.7.3.   Recent Developments

15.7.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.7.5.   Key Personnel

15.7.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.8.              Vaxess Technologies

15.8.1.   Business Overview

15.8.2.   Product Offerings

15.8.3.   Recent Developments

15.8.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.8.5.   Key Personnel

15.8.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.9.              PFIZER, INC.

15.9.1.   Business Overview

15.9.2.   Product Offerings

15.9.3.   Recent Developments

15.9.4.   Financials (As Reported)

15.9.5.   Key Personnel

15.9.6.   SWOT Analysis

15.10.            MERCK & CO., INC.

15.10.1.                Business Overview

15.10.2.                Product Offerings

15.10.3.                Recent Developments

15.10.4.                Financials (As Reported)

15.10.5.                Key Personnel

15.10.6.                SWOT Analysis

16. Strategic Recommendations

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

down-arrow

The market size of the Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market was estimated to be USD 1.10 Billion in 2023.

down-arrow

The Trivalent Flu Vaccine segment demonstrated significant dominance in 2023, primarily due to Companies that innovate and offer microneedle-based trivalent flu vaccines may gain a competitive advantage in the flu vaccine market. The combination of a widely accepted vaccine type with advanced delivery technology can position these companies as leaders in the field.

down-arrow

North America emerged as the dominant market in 2023, capturing a significant revenue share due to launch of new flu prevention campaigns and initiatives by healthcare organizations.

down-arrow

Government agencies are investing more in the research and development of microneedle vaccine patches will propel Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine market growth during the forecast period.

Related Reports

profile

Sakshi Bajaal

Business Consultant
Press Release

Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market to Grow with a CAGR of 5.89 % through 2029

May, 2024

Rising global prevalence of influenza is expected to drive the Global Microneedle Flu Vaccine Market growth in the forecast period, 2025-2029.

Why Choose Us