Decentralized Water Treatment Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Treatment Type (Wastewater Treatment, Effluent Treatment, Sewage Treatment, Greywater Treatment, Drinking Water Treatment), By Technology (Membrane Filtration, Chemical Treatment, Biological Treatment, Electrochemical Treatment, Hybrid Systems), By Application (Municipal, Industrial, Agricultural, Commercial, Residential), By Region & Competition, 2020-2030F

Market Overview

The Global Decentralized Water Treatment Market was valued at USD 18.67 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 38.09 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 12.45% during the forecast period.

The global decentralized water treatment market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing concerns over water scarcity, the rising demand for clean water in remote and rapidly urbanizing areas, and the limitations of centralized water infrastructure. Decentralized water treatment systems, which treat water at or near the point of use, offer flexible, scalable, and cost-effective solutions for regions lacking extensive water distribution networks. These systems are particularly valuable in rural areas, disaster-affected regions, temporary construction sites, and developing nations where centralized systems are either too costly or infeasible to implement. Moreover, advancements in compact modular technologies and treatment processes—such as membrane filtration, UV disinfection, and biological treatment—have significantly improved the efficiency and reliability of decentralized systems, making them a viable option for both potable and non-potable water applications.

Industrial, municipal, commercial, and residential sectors are increasingly adopting decentralized water treatment solutions to meet specific water quality standards and reduce dependency on centralized infrastructure. In the industrial sector, particularly within food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals, decentralized treatment is being used to manage process water, minimize wastewater discharge, and comply with stringent environmental regulations. Municipal governments in developing economies are also turning to decentralized systems to expand water access in underserved communities, enhance resilience to climate-related water supply disruptions, and lower the environmental impact of water distribution and treatment.

The market is further propelled by growing investments in smart water infrastructure and the integration of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, which enable real-time monitoring, automation, and remote management of treatment systems. Governments and environmental bodies are supporting decentralized approaches through favorable regulations and incentives, while private firms and NGOs are partnering to deploy cost-effective systems in water-stressed regions. Regions such as Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa are emerging as high-potential markets due to rapid population growth, urban migration, and infrastructure challenges. Meanwhile, North America and Europe continue to adopt decentralized systems for applications such as rainwater harvesting, greywater recycling, and industrial wastewater treatment.

Despite the growth potential, challenges remain in the form of high initial capital costs, inconsistent maintenance practices, and regulatory barriers in certain countries. Nonetheless, the decentralized water treatment market is expected to witness sustained expansion in the coming years, as water stress intensifies and stakeholders seek adaptable, resilient, and sustainable water management solutions.

Key Market Drivers

Rising Water Scarcity and Climate Stress

The global water crisis continues to intensify due to increasing demand, population growth, and erratic climate patterns. By 2030, the world is expected to face a 40% shortfall in freshwater availability. Over 2.3 billion people live in water-stressed countries, and this number is projected to rise sharply. Agriculture consumes nearly 70% of all freshwater globally, and groundwater levels in key regions like India and the southwestern United States are declining at rates of up to 1 meter per year. In Africa, around 400 million people still lack access to basic drinking water services. At the same time, rising sea levels and extreme weather are contaminating surface water sources. In Asia, nearly 21% of surface water is classified as unfit for human use. These conditions are accelerating the demand for decentralized water treatment systems, which provide a fast, local, and flexible response to water shortages. Modular and off-grid units can operate in drought-prone regions without centralized infrastructure, enabling households, farms, and industries to independently recycle and reuse water. Furthermore, decentralized systems reduce losses from water transportation—centralized pipelines lose 20–30% of water due to leakage, evaporation, and theft. As climate change exacerbates resource stress, decentralized treatment becomes not only a sustainable solution but a necessity for resilience.

Urbanization and Aging Infrastructure

Urbanization is expanding rapidly, placing immense pressure on existing water infrastructure. Over 56% of the global population now lives in urban areas, a figure expected to rise to 68% by 2050. In many developing countries, centralized water systems cannot keep up with this growth—cities like Jakarta and Lagos experience intermittent water supply for over 40% of residents. In India alone, 460 million urban dwellers face irregular access to piped water. In developed economies, the problem lies in aging infrastructure; in the United States, approximately 30% of water mains are more than 50 years old. Globally, water distribution networks lose around 25–30% of treated water due to leaks. The high cost of upgrading or expanding centralized systems makes decentralized treatment a more viable solution. Compact, containerized plants can serve specific communities or buildings without requiring large-scale capital investments. For instance, decentralized greywater recycling in urban housing can reduce freshwater demand by up to 40%. Urban slums and peri-urban zones benefit greatly from on-site water purification units, especially where land use is unplanned or informal. These solutions are also quicker to deploy; whereas large infrastructure projects can take 5–10 years, decentralized systems can be operational in under 6 months. This speed and adaptability make them ideal for fast-growing cities facing water and sanitation challenges.

Technological Advancements in Water Treatment

Innovations in water treatment technologies are revolutionizing decentralized systems by making them more compact, efficient, and affordable. Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have improved treatment efficiency by 25–35% compared to traditional activated sludge systems. Energy-efficient reverse osmosis (RO) systems now consume 30% less power than earlier models, making them viable for off-grid use. UV and ozone disinfection technologies offer over 99.9% pathogen removal without requiring chemical additives. IoT integration in decentralized systems allows real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance, reducing operational downtime by 40–60%. The rise of solar-powered treatment units has enabled deployment in remote areas where electricity access is limited—solar water treatment systems have increased coverage in off-grid African villages by 33% in three years. Modular containerized plants have become popular for their plug-and-play capability; setup times are reduced by up to 70% compared to conventional builds. These systems can treat between 10,000 to 100,000 liters per day, depending on configuration, and can be scaled easily based on demand. With the cost of advanced filtration materials decreasing by 20% over the past five years, decentralized systems are becoming more accessible. As technology continues to evolve, these treatment solutions are expected to play a vital role in bridging the water access gap worldwide.

Regulatory Push and Environmental Compliance

Governments and regulatory bodies are increasingly mandating stricter water treatment standards and pushing industries toward sustainable water practices. In regions like the European Union, compliance with water reuse directives is required by 2025 for all municipalities over 20,000 population. In India, zero liquid discharge (ZLD) is now mandatory for several high-polluting industries such as textiles and tanneries. Over 65% of industrial units in China’s eastern provinces have installed on-site treatment systems to comply with environmental audits. Fines for non-compliance have risen substantially—penalties in the U.S. under the Clean Water Act can reach USD 56,000 per day per violation. Additionally, over 100 multinational corporations have pledged to achieve water neutrality or water positivity by 2030, which includes on-site recycling through decentralized plants. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) benchmarks are also shaping corporate behavior; investors increasingly demand sustainability metrics in water use. Decentralized treatment systems help meet these compliance goals by ensuring treated effluent meets regulatory standards, often with automation and remote monitoring. These systems also support environmental sustainability by enabling rainwater harvesting, greywater reuse, and nutrient recovery. The growing global alignment of policy, investor pressure, and environmental advocacy creates a supportive landscape for decentralized treatment adoption.

Industrial and Commercial Demand for On-Site Solutions

Industries and commercial facilities are increasingly turning to decentralized water treatment systems for cost savings, environmental compliance, and operational continuity. Industrial processes in sectors like food & beverage, pharmaceuticals, and chemicals generate large volumes of wastewater with varying characteristics. Treating this water on-site helps companies reduce water intake by up to 45% and lower discharge fees by 30–50%. For example, beverage plants in Latin America have saved over 200 million liters annually by installing on-site reuse systems. In the textile industry, decentralized systems have helped reduce freshwater consumption per garment by 25%. Commercial buildings such as hotels, malls, and hospitals are also installing greywater and rainwater treatment systems to meet LEED or green building certification standards. In Singapore, more than 60% of new commercial buildings include decentralized recycling units. Data centers, which require cooling, are using decentralized systems to recycle condensate and reduce water draw by up to 70%. Even temporary setups—construction sites, refugee camps, or mining operations—benefit from mobile water treatment units that can process up to 50,000 liters per day. These on-site systems minimize transport costs, offer faster turnaround, and give operators direct control over water quality, which is critical in regulated industries or hygiene-sensitive environments. This trend indicates a long-term shift toward self-sufficient water management at the facility level.

Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

High Capital and Operational Costs

One of the most prominent barriers to the adoption of decentralized water treatment systems is the relatively high upfront investment required. While modular systems are often more cost-effective in the long term, the initial capital expenditure (CAPEX) for installation, equipment, and site preparation can be prohibitive—especially for small communities, NGOs, or start-up commercial facilities. Advanced systems such as membrane bioreactors (MBRs), ultrafiltration (UF), and UV disinfection require specialized components that can increase capital costs by 20–30% compared to conventional systems. Additionally, decentralized units lack economies of scale. Per-liter treatment costs in small-scale systems are often 15–25% higher than in centralized plants. Operational expenditures (OPEX) also pose a challenge due to the need for regular maintenance, skilled labor, and consumables such as chemicals and filter membranes. In remote areas, logistical expenses for spare parts and technical support can escalate by 30–40%. Moreover, energy consumption can be a concern for non-solar-powered systems, particularly in energy-deficient regions. Financial support mechanisms such as government subsidies or green financing options are not always available or accessible, especially in emerging economies. Without attractive return on investment (ROI) models, many potential adopters—especially municipalities and SMEs—delay or avoid decentralized system deployment altogether. Addressing this challenge requires innovative financial models, public-private partnerships, and wider access to low-interest loans or development aid.

Lack of Skilled Workforce and Technical Expertise

Decentralized water treatment systems, especially those employing advanced technologies, require skilled operators and engineers for setup, operation, and maintenance. Unfortunately, many regions where decentralized systems are most needed—such as rural or underdeveloped areas—suffer from a lack of trained personnel. Operating a membrane bioreactor or maintaining UV disinfection units involves knowledge of microbiological standards, chemical dosing, sensor calibration, and system diagnostics. In some low-income countries, over 60% of water treatment systems are reported to operate below optimal performance due to poor maintenance or mismanagement. Human error contributes to system downtime and even health risks when water is improperly treated. Training programs are limited or non-existent in many parts of Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Moreover, remote monitoring technologies, while helpful, are not a substitute for on-site expertise when mechanical failures or emergencies occur. Language barriers and lack of localized technical documentation further complicate adoption. The reliance on external contractors for even minor system repairs can lead to delays of several days or even weeks. As a result, many communities lose trust in decentralized systems or abandon them altogether after initial installation. Bridging this skills gap will require investment in vocational training, technical education partnerships, and simplified, user-friendly system interfaces tailored to non-specialist users.

Regulatory and Institutional Barriers

Decentralized water treatment systems often operate in a gray zone of regulatory oversight. In many countries, water treatment laws and quality standards are designed with centralized utilities in mind, lacking clear provisions or performance benchmarks for small-scale or on-site systems. The absence of harmonized regulations creates confusion over licensing, discharge compliance, and water reuse permissions. In some cases, decentralized systems are deemed non-compliant due to technicalities, even if they produce water of acceptable quality. This deters both private and public sector investment. In India, for example, overlapping responsibilities between urban local bodies, pollution control boards, and water resource departments often delay project approvals by several months. In Africa and Latin America, fragmented policy frameworks result in inconsistent enforcement, making it difficult for system providers to scale operations. Developers and commercial buildings also face zoning and land-use restrictions that may prohibit on-site treatment units. Another regulatory hurdle is the lack of formal recognition for treated greywater or effluent reuse in agriculture, landscaping, or industrial applications, limiting the economic benefits of recycling. Additionally, obtaining subsidies or tax incentives is often complex due to bureaucratic inefficiencies or corruption. Until governments streamline their water policies and develop decentralized-specific regulations, system deployment will remain slow and fragmented.

Fragmented Market and Lack of Standardization

The decentralized water treatment market is highly fragmented, comprising a mix of multinational firms, local integrators, NGOs, and startup technology providers. While this diversity encourages innovation, it also results in a lack of uniformity in design, quality, and performance. There is no universal standard or certification process governing decentralized systems, making it difficult for buyers to compare products or ensure long-term reliability. For example, two treatment units with similar output capacities may vary drastically in terms of efficiency, lifespan, and maintenance requirements. This inconsistency discourages large-scale procurement by municipalities and NGOs, who prioritize predictable performance over experimental technologies. Additionally, component incompatibility between systems—such as membranes, pumps, or sensors—makes maintenance and scalability difficult. Customers often become locked into proprietary systems, increasing lifecycle costs. In the absence of standardization, vendors may overstate their capabilities or under-deliver on system specifications. As a result, trust is eroded in the market, particularly among first-time buyers. Furthermore, investors hesitate to fund companies without proven, certifiable products. Establishing clear performance standards, third-party verification, and interoperable design guidelines could improve transparency and reduce buyer hesitation. Without it, the market will continue to grow unevenly, limited to regions with strong oversight or donor support.

Challenges in Public Awareness and Behavioral Adoption

Despite the proven benefits of decentralized water treatment, public understanding of these systems remains low. In many areas, users are unfamiliar with how decentralized units work or the value they provide. Misconceptions persist that decentralized systems are unreliable, expensive, or inferior to centralized infrastructure. In some communities, people are reluctant to reuse treated greywater or recycled wastewater due to cultural taboos or safety concerns, even when water meets health standards. Surveys indicate that over 45% of users in emerging markets are unwilling to consume water from decentralized systems without visible branding or government endorsement. Public mistrust often stems from failed pilot programs or poor post-installation support, which leaves communities disillusioned. In urban settings, property developers may see decentralized systems as unnecessary complications unless mandated by regulation or linked to financial incentives. Moreover, decentralized water treatment requires behavior change—users must monitor consumption, separate greywater from blackwater, or maintain onsite equipment. Without community engagement, many systems fall into disuse. Marketing efforts from solution providers are often too technical or narrowly targeted, missing the broader public. To overcome this challenge, awareness campaigns, school-based education, community consultations, and public-private demonstrations are essential. Behavioral change programs that focus on user ownership, accountability, and benefits can accelerate adoption and ensure long-term system viability.

Key Market Trends

Growing Use of Decentralized Systems in Industrial Applications

Industries across sectors such as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, textiles, oil & gas, and chemicals are increasingly adopting decentralized water treatment solutions. These systems offer on-site treatment of process water and effluent, enabling industries to reduce freshwater intake and meet stringent environmental discharge regulations. Industrial operators are motivated by the ability to recover up to 60–70% of wastewater for reuse, especially in regions facing water stress. Decentralized units provide operational flexibility, allowing factories to scale up or down treatment capacity based on production cycles. For example, textile dyeing units in Southeast Asia have adopted containerized RO and MBR plants to recycle process water and reduce environmental penalties. Similarly, breweries in Europe have installed compact anaerobic systems to treat high-strength organic wastewater and recover biogas for energy use. Pharmaceutical plants, which require strict quality compliance, are using decentralized UV- and ozone-based disinfection units. Decentralized systems are also being integrated into zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) frameworks, where every drop of water is reused or safely evaporated. These solutions not only support regulatory compliance but also reduce operational risks associated with fluctuating municipal water supply or rising water tariffs. As industries strive to achieve ESG goals and reduce their water footprint, the decentralized model is becoming an integral part of sustainable manufacturing strategies.

Rising Adoption in Building-Level Water Management

There is a growing trend toward the integration of decentralized water treatment systems at the building or community level, especially in urban and semi-urban environments. Driven by green building regulations, water conservation policies, and consumer awareness, these systems are increasingly being deployed in residential complexes, commercial buildings, and mixed-use developments. Technologies such as membrane filtration, greywater recycling, and rainwater harvesting are being used in tandem to reduce municipal water demand by up to 50%. Many countries have introduced policies requiring new buildings to install on-site water reuse systems as a condition for occupancy permits. For instance, decentralized greywater recycling systems in apartment complexes can reduce per capita water consumption by 30–40%, easing pressure on municipal utilities. Hotels and office buildings are also leveraging decentralized systems to reduce their environmental footprint and achieve LEED or WELL certification. Additionally, smart controllers are enabling building managers to monitor usage, automate pump operations, and detect leaks in real-time. With increasing urban population density and the need for sustainable infrastructure, decentralized water treatment is emerging as a key component of urban water resilience. The trend is also being bolstered by real estate developers who recognize the commercial value of eco-friendly amenities.

Emergence of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) and Development Projects

Another significant trend is the involvement of public-private partnerships (PPPs) and international development agencies in expanding access to decentralized water treatment solutions. Governments in water-stressed regions are turning to PPP models to overcome financial and technical barriers in deploying these systems. Projects funded by multilateral institutions and development banks are increasingly supporting decentralized water initiatives in Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. For example, donor-funded projects are providing compact solar-powered treatment units to rural schools and clinics, enhancing health outcomes and school attendance. In refugee camps and informal settlements, PPPs are being used to install decentralized plants that can serve up to 5,000 people per day. These partnerships often include long-term service agreements, where private operators handle system maintenance and community training. Some programs use performance-based financing, linking payments to water quality and uptime. Additionally, local entrepreneurs are being engaged in service delivery through franchise or pay-per-use models. This approach not only improves system sustainability but also creates jobs and community ownership. The trend reflects a broader shift toward inclusive water access strategies that leverage decentralized infrastructure, especially where centralized networks are slow to develop or economically unviable.

Segmental Insights

Treatment Type Insights

Wastewater Treatment segment dominates in the Global Decentralized Water Treatment market in 2024 due to its critical role in addressing urbanization, industrialization, and environmental compliance pressures. As cities expand and rural-urban migration increases, the burden on centralized sewage systems grows significantly. Many regions—especially in developing economies—lack sufficient centralized infrastructure, resulting in untreated or partially treated wastewater being discharged into the environment. Decentralized wastewater treatment systems (DWTS) provide an effective solution, especially for remote areas, peri-urban zones, and rapidly developing regions where extending municipal sewage lines is economically or logistically impractical.

Decentralized systems offer localized treatment at or near the source, minimizing the need for extensive sewer networks. These systems are particularly beneficial in regions with fragmented settlements or informal housing, where centralized solutions are not feasible. In India, for instance, over 30% of urban households are not connected to centralized sewer lines, creating strong demand for small-scale treatment units. Similarly, in Africa, over 60% of urban wastewater is discharged without treatment, emphasizing the need for decentralized alternatives.

Moreover, the increasing focus on sustainability and water reuse is driving adoption. Decentralized wastewater systems can recover up to 70–80% of treated effluent for non-potable uses like landscaping, toilet flushing, or agricultural irrigation. Industries are also deploying compact systems to meet zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) norms and minimize environmental impact. Compliance with environmental regulations—such as discharge limits and effluent reuse mandates—has prompted both private and public stakeholders to adopt decentralized wastewater treatment systems over traditional models.

Technological advancements, such as membrane bioreactors (MBR), sequential batch reactors (SBR), and containerized plug-and-play systems, have made these units more efficient and easier to deploy. The combination of environmental urgency, infrastructure gaps, and technological readiness makes wastewater treatment the dominant and fastest-expanding segment in the decentralized water treatment market in 2024.

Technology Insights

Chemical Treatment segment dominated the Global Decentralized Water Treatment market in 2024 due to its cost-effectiveness, rapid disinfection capability, and low operational complexity. Chemical methods like chlorination, coagulation, and pH adjustment are widely adopted in both rural and urban decentralized setups for eliminating pathogens and improving water quality. These solutions are especially preferred in emergency response systems, small communities, and industrial sites where quick, scalable treatment is essential. Additionally, ease of storage, minimal infrastructure requirements, and compatibility with modular units further supported widespread adoption, particularly in developing regions lacking advanced filtration or biological treatment infrastructure.

Download Free Sample Report

Regional Insights

Largest Region

North America dominates the Global Decentralized Water Treatment market in 2024 due to a combination of advanced infrastructure, strict environmental regulations, and growing demand for sustainable water solutions across municipal, industrial, and residential sectors. The United States and Canada have implemented stringent water quality standards enforced by agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health Canada, which require decentralized systems to meet high performance and compliance levels. These regulations have spurred innovation and adoption of decentralized technologies, especially in underserved rural and peri-urban areas where centralized systems are financially or logistically unfeasible.

North America also has a well-developed industrial base—particularly in sectors like oil & gas, food and beverage, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals—which relies on decentralized systems for process water treatment and wastewater reuse. Industries are increasingly adopting on-site treatment systems to meet zero-liquid discharge (ZLD) goals, reduce operational costs, and comply with local discharge regulations. Additionally, the growing frequency of climate-related disruptions such as droughts, floods, and wildfires is encouraging municipalities and commercial establishments to invest in decentralized, resilient water solutions.

Technological advancement is another key driver. North American companies lead in smart water technologies, including IoT-enabled systems for remote monitoring, AI-based diagnostics, and energy-efficient treatment units. Over 60% of new decentralized installations in the region are equipped with automation and smart sensors. Furthermore, state-level incentives, green building codes, and sustainability certifications such as LEED are promoting adoption of decentralized systems in residential and commercial construction projects.

Rising public awareness around water reuse, combined with growing investments from both government and private sectors, further strengthens North America's leadership. With a strong regulatory framework, high technological maturity, and increasing demand for water independence, North America is positioned as the leading region in the decentralized water treatment market in 2024.

Emerging Region

Europe is the emerging region in the Global Decentralized Water Treatment market in the coming period due to tightening environmental regulations, increasing urban-rural water infrastructure gaps, and a strong push for circular economy practices. The EU Urban Wastewater Directive and national policies promote water reuse, driving demand for on-site treatment solutions. Additionally, aging centralized infrastructure in Western Europe and growing water stress in Southern Europe are encouraging municipalities and industries to adopt modular, energy-efficient systems. Investments in smart water technologies, supported by the EU’s Green Deal, further accelerate adoption. Rising public awareness and green building initiatives also contribute to Europe’s growing market role.

Recent Developments

• In February 2024, The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) signed a TADOX Technology and Trademark License Agreement with Ion Exchange India Ltd. The agreement enables the commercialization of TERI’s patented TADOX wastewater treatment technology for industrial applications. The ceremony was attended by senior officials from the Ministry of Jal Shakti, TERI, and Ion Exchange, marking a strategic move to advance industrial wastewater innovation and support India’s clean water initiatives through advanced treatment technologies.
• In January 2025, Metro Pacific Water Solutions (MPWS) and Hitachi Asia Ltd. signed an MoU to explore collaboration in the Philippines’ water and wastewater sectors. With only 10% of wastewater currently treated, the government aims to reach 80% coverage by 2028. This partnership reflects MPWS’s strategic efforts to leverage Hitachi’s expertise in addressing critical public health and environmental challenges through advanced water infrastructure development in a high-growth, underpenetrated market.
• Osmoflo Water Management (Australia) and Aqua Membranes (USA) announced an exclusive partnership in January 2025 to integrate 3D Printed Spacer Technology® into reverse osmosis (RO) systems. This collaboration combines Aqua Membranes’ proprietary innovation with Osmoflo’s operational and integration capabilities to enhance RO performance across desalination applications. The alliance aims to deliver higher system efficiency and water recovery, positioning both firms at the forefront of advanced membrane-based water treatment solutions.
• Crown Electrokinetics Corp. announced plans in December 2024 to construct and co-own a reverse osmosis (RO) desalination plant in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, in partnership with 529 Capital. Utilizing water from Crown’s proprietary slant wells, the plant will deliver a new, sustainable source of clean drinking water. The project reflects Crown’s strategic expansion in environmental infrastructure and supports regional water security through advanced desalination and private-sector collaboration.
• In May 2025, C&S Chemicals, a vertically integrated provider of specialty chemical treatment solutions, announced a strategic partnership with ChemCentric, a Houston-based supplier of boiler, cooling water, and wastewater treatment chemicals. This move enhances C&S’s industrial water treatment capabilities and broadens its market footprint across refinery and petrochemical sectors. The partnership aligns with C&S’s growth strategy to expand its geographic reach and strengthen service offerings for industrial and municipal clients in the North American market.
• In March 2025, Thermax Ltd entered into a joint venture with Brazil-based OCQ to form Thermax Chemical Solutions Pvt Ltd in India. Thermax holds a 51% stake, while OCQ owns 49%. The JV aims to manufacture and commercialize OCQ’s specialty chemicals, initially focusing on acrylic resins for industries such as paints, adhesives, textiles, and infrastructure. The facility will be located within Thermax’s existing Jhagadia site in Gujarat, with future plans to expand into polyester and alkyd resins.

Key Market Players

• Veolia Environnement S.A.  
• SUEZ SA
• Xylem Inc.
• Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.
• Pentair plc
• Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
• Hitachi Ltd.
• Toray Industries, Inc.
• GE Water & Process Technologies
• Alfa Laval AB   

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Decentralized Water Treatment Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

•  Decentralized Water Treatment Market, By Treatment Type:

o   Wastewater Treatment

o   Effluent Treatment

o   Sewage Treatment

o   Greywater Treatment

o   Drinking Water Treatment

• Decentralized Water Treatment Market, By Technology:

o   Membrane Filtration

o   Chemical Treatment

o   Biological Treatment

o   Electrochemical Treatment

o   Hybrid Systems

• Decentralized Water Treatment Market, By Application:

o   Municipal

o   Industrial

o   Agricultural

o   Commercial

o   Residential

• Decentralized Water Treatment Market, By Region:

o   North America

§  United States

§  Canada

§  Mexico

o   Europe

§  Germany

§  France

§  United Kingdom

§  Italy

§  Spain

o   South America

§  Brazil

§  Argentina

§  Colombia

o   Asia-Pacific

§  China

§  India

§  Japan

§  South Korea

§  Australia

o   Middle East & Africa

§  Saudi Arabia

§  UAE

§  South Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Decentralized Water Treatment Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Decentralized Water Treatment Market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

• Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Global Decentralized Water Treatment Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]