Main Content start here
Main Layout
Report Description

Report Description

Forecast Period

2026-2030

Market Size (2024)

USD 244.61 Million

CAGR (2025-2030)

4.09%

Fastest Growing Segment

Unmanned Vehicle Control System

Largest Market

China

Market Size (2030)

USD 311.12 Million

Market Overview:

Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market was valued at USD 244.61 Million in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 311.12 Million by 2030 with a CAGR of 4.09% during the forecast period. Asia Pacific Combat Management System market is experiencing strong momentum driven by the rising need for advanced defense technologies that enhance real-time situational awareness, command, and control across naval operations. Growth is supported by rapid advancements in integrated combat systems that link sensors, weapons, and communication networks to ensure seamless battlefield coordination. Trends shaping the market include the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis, growing use of modular and open architecture systems that allow easy upgrades, and the increasing emphasis on cybersecurity measures to safeguard sensitive defense networks.

Market Drivers

Rising Defense Modernization Programs

Defense forces worldwide are undergoing large-scale modernization initiatives to enhance their naval capabilities, and this is a primary growth driver for combat management systems. Governments are increasing budget allocations toward advanced naval technologies that improve real-time decision-making, enhance interoperability, and support multi-domain warfare. Combat management systems are at the core of these modernization efforts as they integrate sensors, radars, weapons, and communication networks into a unified operational framework. These programs aim to replace outdated systems that lack speed, connectivity, and resilience against modern threats such as electronic warfare or cyberattacks. With growing geopolitical complexities and the need for maritime superiority, investment in advanced platforms is being prioritized. For instance, in 2025, Asia-Pacific defence spending reached USD 632.2 billion, rising 5.1% in real terms, with China accounting for USD 291.8 billion (46.1%) and core US allies Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Australia spending USD 181.1 billion (28.6%). When including Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand, the US-aligned total rises to USD 211.0 billion (33.3%). Growth among the four main US partners slowed to 2.2% in 2025, following a record 13.2% spike in 2023, driven largely by Japan and South Korea’s double-digit increases.

Increasing Adoption of Network-Centric Warfare

The evolution of modern naval combat is centered around network-centric warfare, where the ability to share real-time data across multiple platforms determines operational success. Combat management systems form the backbone of this approach by creating a digital framework that connects surface vessels, submarines, aircraft, and command centers. These systems process massive amounts of sensor data, enabling faster and more accurate decision-making. The push toward network-centric operations is being driven by the need to counter multidimensional threats such as unmanned systems, stealth technologies, and missile attacks. Integration of satellite communication and cloud-based platforms further strengthens these systems by ensuring continuous data flow and redundancy. For instance, China’s naval computer is using the “internet of cars” industrial cloud to design large warships, running hydrodynamic simulations with 14,000 CPUs in just 8 hours. Leveraging 1.7 million 5G towers and expanding industrial cloud networks, this integration repurposes civilian technology for military innovation, accelerating warship development while highlighting challenges in interoperability and cybersecurity.

Growing Role of Automation and AI Integration

Artificial intelligence and automation are becoming essential in modern combat systems, enhancing speed, accuracy, and adaptability in naval operations. Combat management platforms now integrate AI algorithms for predictive threat detection, automated target classification, and decision support, reducing the workload on human operators. This allows naval forces to respond to high-speed threats with greater efficiency and precision. Automation also plays a key role in unmanned and remotely operated systems, where human involvement is limited, yet rapid decision-making is critical. The ability of AI-driven systems to learn from vast datasets improves situational awareness by filtering noise and identifying actionable intelligence. Automation reduces human error, strengthens resilience in complex combat environments, and improves system performance under high-pressure conditions. For instance, China’s DeepSeek LLM, developed at a fraction of Western costs with only one-tenth of the computing power of models like ChatGPT-4, is being integrated into UAVs, command systems, and autonomous vehicles, showcasing rapid dual-use experimentation. Reports indicate the PLA is building a ‘multi-domain kill-web’ to coordinate aircraft, satellites, sensors, and missiles, aiming for network-centric warfare by 2030. With 1.7 million 5G towers, a vast drone market, and strong civil-military fusion, China is accelerating real-time decision loops, precision mass deployment, and reconnaissance-strike capabilities posing a direct challenge to US systems integration and battlefield dominance.


Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

High Development and Procurement Costs

One of the major challenges in the combat management system market is the extremely high cost associated with development, integration, and procurement. These systems require advanced software, cutting-edge hardware, and extensive testing to meet the demanding requirements of modern warfare. Naval vessels often require customized systems to align with specific platforms, which adds to complexity and expense. Maintenance, training, and periodic upgrades further increase the lifecycle cost of these systems. Smaller defense budgets or competing priorities can delay modernization projects, limiting procurement opportunities. High costs also pose challenges for scalability, as navies may adopt limited systems instead of equipping their entire fleets.

Interoperability Issues Between Legacy and Modern Systems

Combat management systems are expected to seamlessly integrate with legacy naval assets, yet interoperability often becomes a hurdle. Many navies operate fleets that include a mix of modern and older vessels, creating compatibility issues. Legacy systems often lack the capacity to handle large-scale data integration or advanced communication protocols, making it difficult to achieve true network-centric warfare. Bridging the technological gap requires complex engineering and extensive testing, which delays implementation. Interoperability challenges can reduce operational efficiency by creating bottlenecks in information sharing and slowing down decision-making processes.

Key Market Trends

Shift Toward Modular and Open Architecture Systems

A growing trend in the combat management system market is the adoption of modular and open architecture designs. These systems are built with flexibility in mind, enabling easier upgrades, faster integration of new technologies, and lower lifecycle costs. Open architecture allows interoperability between multiple vendors’ systems, reducing vendor lock-in and expanding procurement options. This trend supports scalability, as navies can add capabilities over time without replacing entire systems. Modular systems also support integration of emerging technologies such as AI, unmanned platforms, and advanced cyber defense tools. The ability to future-proof combat systems through open architecture is becoming a key procurement requirement, reflecting the industry’s shift toward adaptable and long-term solutions.

Rising Importance of Cybersecurity in Combat Systems

Cybersecurity has become a critical focus in combat management systems due to the increasing risk of cyberattacks on defense networks. Modern naval operations rely on interconnected systems, which create multiple entry points for potential threats. Combat systems now integrate advanced cybersecurity tools such as intrusion detection, encryption, and continuous monitoring to safeguard sensitive data and ensure operational continuity. This trend is reinforced by the growing sophistication of cyber warfare tactics that target military networks to disrupt communication and decision-making. Vendors are developing combat platforms with built-in resilience against cyber threats, including real-time threat identification and rapid recovery capabilities. The growing emphasis on cybersecurity is transforming how systems are designed, tested, and deployed, making it a central element of next-generation naval platforms. For instance, India’s defense expenditure reached $86.1 billion in 2024, positioning it as the 5th largest global spender. The budget saw a 1.6% year-on-year increase, reflecting a steady growth trajectory. Strategic focus areas remain modernization of armed forces and maintaining a balance of power against China and Pakistan, with emphasis on strengthening indigenous capabilities and operational readiness across land, air, and naval domains.

Integration of Unmanned and Autonomous Platforms

Unmanned and autonomous platforms are becoming increasingly important in naval warfare, and their integration into combat management systems is a major trend. Combat systems are being designed to incorporate unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), underwater drones, and surface robots into command-and-control frameworks. These platforms extend the reach of naval forces, providing reconnaissance, surveillance, and even combat capabilities without risking human lives. Integration requires highly adaptive combat management solutions capable of processing diverse data streams from multiple unmanned assets simultaneously. The trend is being fueled by advancements in automation, AI, and secure communication technologies that allow unmanned systems to operate effectively alongside manned platforms. This development is reshaping naval doctrines by enabling distributed and flexible operations.   

Segmental Insights

Platform Insights

In 2024, destroyers held the dominant share in Asia Pacific Combat Management System market, driven by their strategic role as multi-mission naval assets capable of handling a wide spectrum of maritime threats. Destroyers are equipped with advanced radar, sonar, missile systems, and command-and-control technologies, making them the backbone of naval fleets for power projection and defense operations. Their ability to integrate sophisticated combat management systems enables superior situational awareness, faster threat detection, and coordinated responses across multiple domains, including air, surface, and underwater environments. The versatility of destroyers in supporting both offensive and defensive missions makes them indispensable for maintaining naval superiority and ensuring secure sea lanes. For instance, As of March 2025, destroyer fleets are expanding across major navies: the U.S. leads with 81, followed by China (50), Japan (42), India (13), and South Korea (13). China’s Type 055 and 052D highlight rapid growth, Japan focuses on missile-defense destroyers, and South Korea fields heavily armed Sejong the Great-class. India, though modernizing with Project-18 Next Generation Destroyers (13,000 tons, 120–144 VLS), lags in numbers. With China and Japan scaling fleets, India must expand beyond its planned six NGDs to 18–24 ships with advanced VLS, hypersonics, and ABM systems to close the gap in Asia’s rising destroyer race.


Download Free Sample Report

Country Insights

In 2024, China emerged as the dominant region in Asia Pacific Combat Management System market, supported by extensive naval modernization programs and the development of advanced surface and subsurface platforms. The focus on expanding naval fleets with destroyers, aircraft carriers, and submarines created strong demand for integrated combat management systems capable of enhancing real-time decision-making, weapon control, and situational awareness. Large-scale investment in next-generation technologies such as AI-driven threat analysis, cybersecurity-enabled platforms, and multi-domain interoperability strengthened China’s position, with a clear emphasis on building naval dominance and integrating cutting-edge command-and-control systems across its fleet. For instance, China’s military expenditure in 2024 reached $314 billion, marking a 7.0% year-on-year increase and accounting for 50% of Asia & Oceania’s total defense spending. This rise reflects 30 consecutive years of growth, driven by priorities such as modernization of the armed forces, strengthening cyberwarfare capabilities, and expanding the nuclear arsenal. The overarching strategic aim is to reinforce global military standing and assert regional dominance.

Japan also contributed significantly to market development, with its focus on technologically advanced naval platforms equipped for high-intensity maritime missions. Combat management systems in Japan are being adopted across destroyers and submarines to enhance anti-submarine warfare, air defense, and electronic warfare capabilities. Strong emphasis on automation, cybersecurity, and integration of unmanned platforms into naval operations has created a steady demand for adaptive and future-ready combat systems, supporting the country’s pursuit of highly advanced fleet capabilities. For instance, Japan allocated $55.3 billion to defense in 2024, representing a 21% annual growth, the largest since 1952, and pushing military spending to 1.4% of GDP, its highest share since 1958. Since 2015, defense expenditure has risen 49%, with the fiscal 2025 defense budget set at 8.70 trillion yen ($55 billion), a 9.4% increase from FY2024. Priorities include long-range standoff strike capability (+32% allocation, ¥297.6B for hypersonics, ¥283.2B for satellite constellation), alongside procurement of frigates, submarines, reconnaissance aircraft, transport/refueling/trainer aircraft, F-35 jets, and next-gen stealth fighter programs. Space and cyber capabilities are also emphasized with ¥123.8B for military satellites (+115%) and ¥97B for a cloud-based unified command system (+29%). Strategically, Japan is focused on counterstrike capabilities, strengthening the US-backed “Indo-Pacific Strategy,” and expanding alliances with Australia, the UK, and the Philippines.

Recent Developments

  • ​In 2025, HAVELSAN upgraded its ADVENT Combat Management System with its AI platform MAIN, adding smart maintenance support, real-time decision assistance, and advanced threat detection to enhance naval combat efficiency across nine countries.
  • In 2025, HAVELSAN expanded the deployment of its ADVENT Combat Management System to more than ten Indonesian naval platforms, as revealed at the Indo Defence 2025 exhibition in Jakarta. This integration spanning both new-build and existing ships supports Indonesia’s digital defense transformation by enhancing tactical capabilities and modernizing command-and-control systems.
  • In 2025, the Indian Navy announced it will replace the French DCNS SUBTICS combat management system on Kalvari-class submarines with an indigenous solution from BEL. The move eliminates reliance on foreign contractors, enables seamless integration of new weapons, and ensures future upgrades across all six submarines, marking a key step toward naval self-reliance.
  • In 2025 at IDEX NAVDEX, the Tawazun Council and Naval Group showcased the UAE’s National Combat Management System, based on SETIS®, highlighting ongoing technology transfer and local capability development for advanced naval systems.
  • In 2025, South Korea’s DAPA launched a $135.9 million program to retrofit all six KDX-II destroyers with a new indigenous Combat Management System (CMS), replacing the Samsung–BAeSEMA system based on Thales TACTICOS. Led by Hanwha Systems, the upgrade will boost combat performance, information processing, sonar, and missile fire-control, while integrating updated towed-array sonar and SM-2 systems to strengthen anti-air and anti-submarine capabilities.

Key Market Players

  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Thales Group
  • BAE Systems Plc.
  • Saab AB
  • Kongsberg Gruppen Asa
  •  Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
  • Leonardo S.P.A.
  • Raytheon Company
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Elbit Systems Ltd.

By Platform

By Component

By Subsystem

By Country

  • Destroyers
  • Submarines
  • Frigates
  • Amphibious Ships
  • Corvettes
  • Fast Attack Craft (FAC)
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Software
  • Hardware
  • Self-defense Management System
  • Situational Awareness System
  • Track Management System
  • Weapon Management System
  • Display System
  • Identification System
  • Unmanned Vehicle Control System
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Indonesia
  • Thailand
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Rest of APAC

Report Scope:

In this report, Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  •           Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market, By Platform:

o    Destroyers

o    Submarines

o    Frigates

o    Amphibious Ships

o    Corvettes

o    Fast Attack Craft (FAC)

o    Aircraft Carriers

  •           Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market, By Component:

o    Software

o    Hardware

  •           Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market, By Subsystem:

o    Self-defense Management System

o    Situational Awareness System

o    Track Management System

o    Weapon Management System

o    Display System

o    Identification System

o    Unmanned Vehicle Control System

  •           Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market, By Country:

o    China

o    India

o    Japan

o    Indonesia

o    Thailand

o    South Korea

o    Australia

o    Rest of APAC

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies presents in Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market.

Available Customizations:

Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market report with the given market data, TechSci Research offers customizations according to the company’s specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected]

Table of content

Table of content

1.  Introduction

1.1.  Product Overview

1.2.  Key Highlights of the Report

1.3.  Market Coverage

1.4.  Market Segments Covered

1.5.  Research Tenure Considered

2.  Research Methodology

2.1.  Methodology Landscape

2.2.  Objective of the Study

2.3.  Baseline Methodology

2.4.  Formulation of the Scope

2.5.  Assumptions and Limitations

2.6.  Sources of Research

2.7.  Approach for the Market Study

2.8.  Methodology Followed for Calculation of Market Size & Market Shares

2.9.  Forecasting Methodology

3.  Executive Summary

3.1.  Overview of the Market

3.2.  Overview of Key Market Segmentations

3.3.  Overview of Key Regions

4.  Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market Outlook

4.1.  Market Size & Forecast

4.1.1.  By Value

4.2.  Market Share & Forecast

4.2.1.  By Subsystem Market Share Analysis (Self-defense Management System, Situational Awareness System, Track Management System, Weapon Management System, Display System, Identification System, Unmanned Vehicle Control System)

4.2.2.  By Component Market Share Analysis (Software, Hardware)

4.2.3.  By Platform Market Share Analysis (Destroyers, Submarines, Frigates, Amphibious Ships, Corvettes, Fast Attack Craft (FAC), Aircraft Carriers)

4.2.4.  By Country

4.2.5.  By Company (2024)

4.3.  Market Map

5.  China Combat Management System Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast 

5.1.1. By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

5.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

5.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.  India Combat Management System Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast 

6.1.1. By Value

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

6.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

6.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.  Japan Combat Management System Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast 

7.1.1. By Value

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

7.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

7.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

8.  Indonesia Combat Management System Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast 

8.1.1. By Value

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

8.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

8.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

9.  Thailand Combat Management System Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast 

9.1.1. By Value

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

9.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

9.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

10. South Korea Combat Management System Market Outlook

10.1.  Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1. By Value

10.2.  Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

10.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

10.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

11. Australia Combat Management System Market Outlook

11.1.  Market Size & Forecast

11.1.1. By Value

11.2.  Market Share & Forecast

11.2.1. By Subsystem Market Share Analysis

11.2.2. By Component Market Share Analysis

11.2.3. By Platform Market Share Analysis

12. Market Dynamics

12.1.  Drivers

12.2.  Challenges

13. Key Market Disruptions

13.1.  Conflicts

13.2.  Pandemic

13.3.  Trade Barriers

14. Market Trends & Developments

15. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

16. Policy & Regulatory Landscape

17. Competitive Landscape

17.1.  Company Profiles

17.1.1. Lockheed Martin Corporation

17.1.1.1. Business Overview

17.1.1.2. Company Snapshot

17.1.1.3. Products & Services

17.1.1.4. Financials (As Per Availability)

17.1.1.5. Key Market Focus & Geographical Presence

17.1.1.6. Recent Developments

17.1.1.7. Key Management Personnel

17.1.2. Thales Group

17.1.3. BAE Systems Plc.

17.1.4. Saab AB

17.1.5. Kongsberg Gruppen Asa

17.1.6.  Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.

17.1.7. Leonardo S.P.A.

17.1.8. Raytheon Company

17.1.9. Northrop Grumman Corporation

17.1.10. Elbit Systems Ltd.

18. Strategic Recommendations

19. About Us & Disclaimer

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

The market size of Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market was estimated to USD 244.61 Million in 2024.

Major drivers for Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market include defense modernization initiatives, increasing adoption of network-centric warfare, integration of AI-driven automation, demand for cybersecurity, and rising deployment of advanced naval platforms.

Major trends in Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market include adoption of modular open-architecture systems, stronger focus on cybersecurity, integration of unmanned platforms, AI-enabled decision support, and growing emphasis on multi-domain interoperability.

Major challenges for Asia Pacific Combat Management System Market include high development and procurement costs, interoperability issues between legacy and modern systems, integration complexity, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and the need for continuous technological upgrades.

Related Reports

We use cookies to deliver the best possible experience on our website. To learn more, visit our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use this site or by closing this box, you consent to our use of cookies. More info.