Active Protection System Market – Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, Segmented By Type (Hard-Kill Systems, Soft-Kill Systems), Platform (Land-based, Airborne, Marine), By Region, Competition, 2018-2028

Customization Enquiry

Buy Now

Summary

Report Description

Forecast Period

2024-2028

Market Size (2022)

USD 3 Billion

CAGR (2023-2028)

6.09%

Fastest Growing Segment

Airborne

Largest Market

North America


Market Overview

Global Active Protection System Market has valued at USD 3 billion in 2022 and is anticipated to project robust growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 6.09% through 2028. In the military, active protection systems are commonly employed, primarily to shield armored fighting vehicles from enemy fire. They can be fitted on combat helicopters, naval warfare ships, tracked or wheeled armored fighting or logistics vehicles, and other systems. For optimal field surveillance and combat during the day or at night or in low visibility, modular optoelectronic sensor systems, target acquisition systems, digital radar processors for target detection, and thermal imaging devices are utilized. Because of the increase in cross-border conflicts, several nations are concentrating on growing their fleets of armored vehicles, which has directly contributed to the expansion of the Active Protection System Industry.

Market Drivers

Growing Threat Landscape

The evolving threat landscape is a primary driver for the global APS market. Modern military forces face a wide range of threats, including anti-tank guided missiles, rocket-propelled grenades, and other precision-guided munitions. These threats are capable of inflicting significant damage to armored vehicles and combat platforms, posing a direct risk to the safety of military personnel. As armed forces worldwide seek to maintain an operational edge and ensure the survivability of their armored assets, the need for effective APS systems becomes increasingly critical. APS technologies provide an additional layer of protection against these threats, intercepting or neutralizing incoming projectiles before they can reach their intended targets. The threat landscape has continued to evolve with the emergence of asymmetric warfare, making APS technologies more relevant than ever. Insurgent groups and non-state actors have gained access to advanced weaponry, further emphasizing the importance of APS in countering these threats.

Advancements in APS Technology

Advancements in APS technology are a significant driver in the global market. Over the past decade, substantial progress has been made in the development and deployment of APS systems. These advancements are reflected in several key areas: Sensor Technology: APS systems rely on advanced sensors to detect and track incoming threats. The integration of high-resolution radar, infrared sensors, and other detection technologies has improved the accuracy and responsiveness of APS systems. APS systems employ various interception mechanisms, such as soft-kill and hard-kill systems. Soft-kill mechanisms include jamming and obscuration techniques to disrupt the guidance systems of incoming projectiles. Hard-kill systems use interceptors to physically destroy or redirect threats. Innovations in both soft-kill and hard-kill technologies have enhanced the effectiveness of APS. Modern APS systems are often integrated into a broader network of sensors and defensive mechanisms. This integration allows for real-time threat assessment and response, enabling APS systems to engage threats more effectively and selectively. The miniaturization of APS components has allowed for their integration into a wider range of platforms, including armored vehicles, tanks, and even helicopters. Smaller, more lightweight systems contribute to increased mobility and flexibility for military forces. APS systems are designed to counter a variety of threats. The ability to adapt to different types of threats and the flexibility to employ various countermeasures have become key attributes of modern APS technologies. As APS technologies continue to advance, they offer enhanced protection to armored assets and enable military forces to respond more effectively to a diverse range of threats. These technological advancements have become a driving force in the adoption of APS systems worldwide.

Operational Effectiveness and Mission Success

The drive for operational effectiveness and mission success is a critical market driver for APS systems. Military forces invest in APS technologies to enhance the survivability of their armored assets and increase their overall combat effectiveness. APS systems help reduce the vulnerability of armored vehicles, enabling them to operate in high-threat environments with greater confidence. By intercepting or neutralizing threats, APS systems protect armored vehicles from damage or destruction, allowing them to continue their mission objectives. APS technologies protect military personnel by reducing the risk of injuries and fatalities resulting from attacks on armored platforms. Enhanced protection from APS systems allows armored vehicles to maintain tactical mobility, maneuvering in and out of combat zones with reduced risk. APS systems enable military forces to achieve their mission objectives by preserving the operational capabilities of their armored assets. APS technologies provide military forces with greater flexibility in responding to diverse threats and engaging in a wider range of operational scenarios. In today's complex and dynamic security environment, military forces place a premium on the ability to carry out missions effectively while minimizing risk to personnel and assets. APS systems play a crucial role in achieving these objectives.

Geopolitical Tensions and Conflict Zones

Geopolitical tensions and active conflict zones around the world have driven the adoption of APS systems. As nations and regions experience heightened security concerns, the demand for APS technologies has surged. These technologies are seen as essential for protecting armored forces in regions where threats are prevalent. The Middle East has witnessed a substantial deployment of APS systems due to ongoing conflicts and security challenges. The proliferation of APS in this region is indicative of the global trend, as nations recognize the need to protect their armored assets in an increasingly dangerous environment. The Russian-Ukrainian conflict, for example, highlighted the importance of APS in countering anti-tank guided missiles and other threats. As conflict zones expand and evolve, the demand for APS systems continues to grow, making them a critical tool for military forces operating in such areas. Geopolitical tensions and conflicts create a strong market driver, compelling nations to invest in APS technologies to protect their armored assets and maintain a strategic advantage in uncertain environments.

Global Defense Budgets and Modernization Initiatives

The allocation of defense budgets and modernization initiatives is a significant driver for the APS market. Nations worldwide are recognizing the importance of APS systems as a key component of their military modernization efforts. As part of broader defense modernization programs, APS technologies are being integrated into armored forces to enhance their capabilities and protection. Key factors driving the incorporation of APS systems into defense budgets and modernization initiatives include Aging armored fleets require upgrades and modernization to meet current and future threats.


Download Free Sample Report

Key Market Challenges

Complex and Evolving Threat Landscape

One of the most significant challenges facing the global APS market is the complexity and constant evolution of the threat landscape. Modern armed forces encounter a wide range of threats, from conventional weapons to asymmetric warfare tactics employed by non-state actors and insurgent groups. The adaptability and ingenuity of these threats present unique challenges to APS systems. Advanced anti-tank guided missiles and rocket-propelled grenades are equipped with various features, such as tandem warheads, top-attack profiles, and high maneuverability. These capabilities make them challenging for APS systems to detect and intercept effectively. The continuous development and proliferation of new weapon systems present challenges for APS technologies. These threats include unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), loitering munitions, and precision-guided munitions that may not be effectively countered by existing APS systems. Adversaries can employ electronic countermeasures to disrupt APS sensors and interceptors, making it harder for these systems to function as intended. Jamming and spoofing techniques can hinder the accuracy and reliability of APS. Some advanced threats are fire-and-forget systems, meaning they do not require continuous guidance once launched. This makes them difficult to counter because APS systems have a limited time to detect and intercept them. The challenge lies in ensuring that APS technologies can adapt to the ever-changing threat landscape. To remain effective, APS systems must be capable of countering not only existing threats but also emerging ones. This requires ongoing research and development, as well as collaboration among governments, defense contractors, and research institutions to stay ahead of evolving threats.

Cost and Budget Constraints

Budget constraints and the overall cost of APS systems present a significant challenge to their widespread adoption and deployment. The development, integration, and maintenance of APS technologies can be costly, and many governments and military forces face budgetary limitations that impact their ability to invest in APS solutions. The research and development of cutting-edge APS technologies require substantial investments. These costs are often incurred by defense contractors, but they can lead to high procurement expenses. Retrofitting existing armored vehicles with APS systems can be costly, especially when vehicles were not initially designed with APS in mind. Integration may involve modifications to the vehicle's architecture, sensors, and power systems, adding to the overall expense. Ongoing maintenance, upgrades, and system enhancements can also strain budgets. APS systems require regular servicing and updates to remain effective and reliable. Defense budgets are allocated to a wide range of military needs, including personnel, infrastructure, and other defense technologies. As a result, APS may not always receive the funding required to ensure comprehensive protection.

Integration with Legacy Vehicle Fleets

Many armed forces operate legacy armored vehicle fleets that were designed and manufactured without APS systems in mind. Retrofitting these vehicles with modern APS solutions presents a significant challenge, as the integration process can be complex and costly. Legacy vehicles may not have the necessary interfaces, power supplies, or structural elements to support the integration of APS components. Retrofitting often requires modifications and upgrades to the vehicle, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Legacy vehicles may have limited weight and space allowances for APS components. This restricts the type and number of sensors and interceptors that can be integrated, potentially reducing the overall effectiveness of the APS system. Retrofitting APS systems can interfere with or duplicate existing vehicle systems. This complicates the integration process and may necessitate additional modifications to ensure smooth operation. The cost of retrofitting APS systems into legacy vehicle fleets can be substantial, and it may not always be justifiable, especially for older or less mission-critical platforms. To address this challenge, military forces must carefully evaluate the cost-benefit analysis of retrofitting legacy vehicles with APS systems. They should consider the importance of the vehicles, the expected operational life, and the compatibility of the APS solution with the platform. Where feasible, standardized retrofit kits and modular APS systems can simplify the integration process and reduce costs.

Key Market Trends

Integration of Multi-Layered APS Systems

One prominent trend in the global APS market is the integration of multi-layered APS systems. Rather than relying on a single layer of defense, modern armored vehicles are increasingly equipped with multiple APS modules, creating a layered defense approach. These multi-layered systems consist of both soft-kill and hard-kill components to address different types of threats effectively. Soft-kill systems are designed to disrupt the guidance and targeting systems of incoming threats, rendering them ineffective. These systems employ jamming, smoke screens, and decoy launchers to confuse and divert projectiles. Soft-kill measures are particularly effective against radio-guided munitions. Hard-kill systems, on the other hand, physically intercept and neutralize threats. They employ sensors to detect incoming projectiles and launch interceptors, such as kinetic energy projectiles or directed energy weapons, to destroy or deflect the threats. Hard-kill measures are essential for countering kinetic energy penetrators and tandem-warhead ATGMs. By combining both soft-kill and hard-kill components in multi-layered APS systems, armored vehicles can address a wide spectrum of threats, including advanced, highly maneuverable missiles. This trend enhances the overall survivability of armored platforms and underscores the importance of a holistic approach to APS.

Adoption of Modular and Upgradeable APS Systems

The adoption of modular and upgradeable APS systems is another significant trend in the global APS market. Armored vehicle manufacturers and military forces are recognizing the importance of flexibility and adaptability in APS technologies. Modular APS systems allow for easy integration and the potential for future upgrades, ensuring that APS capabilities remain effective over time. Modular APS systems are designed with interchangeable components that can be easily replaced or upgraded. This modularity enables the integration of the latest sensors, interceptors, and countermeasures without the need for extensive redesign or reinstallation. Software-defined APS systems provide flexibility through reprogrammable software. This feature allows for adjustments in response to changing threats and operational requirements. The ability to update the software is particularly valuable in addressing emerging threats. Armored vehicles already in service can benefit from modular APS systems that can be retrofitted. This approach extends the life and effectiveness of existing armored fleets by providing them with advanced protection capabilities. Modular APS systems offer scalability, allowing military forces to adapt APS protection to different vehicle types and sizes. From main battle tanks to infantry fighting vehicles, scalable APS solutions can be customized to meet the specific needs of various platforms. The adoption of modular and upgradeable APS systems aligns with the desire for long-term cost-effectiveness and the ability to respond to evolving threat scenarios. It also contributes to the sustainability of armored vehicle fleets by extending their operational life and enhancing their protection capabilities.

Focus on Open-Architecture APS Solutions

Open-architecture APS solutions are gaining prominence in the global market. These systems are designed with open and standardized interfaces, allowing for easier integration of third-party components and technologies. The trend toward open-architecture APS solutions promotes interoperability and collaboration among different defense stakeholders. Open-architecture APS systems are built with interoperability in mind. They can seamlessly integrate with various sensors, platforms, and electronic warfare systems, enhancing the overall effectiveness of APS protection. The open architecture fosters collaboration between different defense industry players, including APS manufacturers, sensor providers, and vehicle integrators. This collaboration accelerates innovation and enables the incorporation of the latest technologies into APS solutions. Open-architecture APS systems provide flexibility, allowing military forces to choose from a range of sensors, countermeasures, and interceptors. This adaptability is essential for addressing specific threats and operational requirements. The open-architecture approach future-proofs APS systems by ensuring compatibility with emerging technologies and standards. It reduces the risk of APS systems becoming obsolete and streamlines the process of incorporating new capabilities. By embracing open-architecture APS solutions, military forces can create a more agile and adaptable defense posture. These systems enable a broader range of technology providers to contribute to APS innovation and development.

Rise of Vehicle-agnostic APS Technologies

Vehicle-agnostic APS technologies are becoming increasingly popular as the trend of retrofitting existing armored vehicles with APS gains momentum. These systems are designed to be adaptable and compatible with various armored platforms, regardless of the manufacturer or vehicle type. The rise of vehicle-agnostic APS technologies is driven by several factors: Many countries maintain diverse armored vehicle fleets, often comprising vehicles from multiple manufacturers. Vehicle-agnostic APS systems allow for consistent protection across these fleets, simplifying maintenance, training, and logistics. As modern APS technologies evolve, retrofitting existing armored vehicles becomes a cost-effective strategy to enhance protection. Vehicle-agnostic APS systems are well-suited for retrofitting, offering compatibility with a broad range of armored platforms. The ability to equip various armored vehicles with the same APS technology promotes interoperability and reduces the complexity of managing different APS solutions within the same military force.

Segmental Insights

Platform Type Analysis

Land-based, aerial, and marine are the three segments of the global market for active protection systems according to platform. With the biggest share, the land-based segment is predicted to grow significantly over the projection period. The strong demand for APS on land-based platforms and the rapid advancement of technology in soft-kill systems are credited with the growth. A few examples include smoke dispensers combined with electronic and laser-based jamming. With the second-largest share, the marine segment is expected to grow at a commendable rate. The increasing demand for sophisticated and next-generation defenses against infrared detection, laser ranging, visual observation, UAV swarm attacks, and laser weapons is the driving force behind this.


Download Free Sample Report

Regional Insights

The global market was dominated by North America. The U.S. Armed Forces developed platform self-protection systems like MAPS, Quick Kill, Iron Curtain, and Directed Energy Weapons to protect its platforms, personnel, and increase situational awareness from both known and unknown threats in response to the growing threat posed by antitank guided missiles and loitering munitions. Europe, which held the second-largest share in 2021, is expected to grow at a commendable rate over the coming years. Due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and their traditional procurement programs, European Union members have increased their investment in next-generation self-protection systems for their armed forces platforms.

Recent Developments

  • In July 2022, Elbit Systems Limited was awarded a contract valued at USD 80 million to provide DIRCM (Direct Infrared Counter Measures) and airborne Electronic Warfare (EW) systems to a nation in the Asia Pacific region.
  • Turkey declared in May 2022 that it would start producing its battle tanks in large quantities. With Aselsan APS, the 65-ton main battle tanks (MBTs) would be able to fend off top-attack anti-tank guided weapons like Javelin.
  • In order to continue producing SPY-6 radars, Raytheon Missiles & Defense and the U.S. Navy inked a $423 million contract in May 2022. At the same time, radars can defend against ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, enemy aircraft, and surface ships.

Key Market Players

  • Artis LLC
  • Aselsan AS.
  • Hensoldt AG
  • Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • SAAB AB
  • Israel Military Industries Ltd.

By Type

By Platform

By Region
  • Hard-Kill Systems
  • Soft-Kill Systems
  • Land-based
  • Airborne
  • Marine
  • North America
  • Europe & CIS
  • Asia Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

 

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Active Protection System Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

  • Active Protection System Market, By Type:

o   Hard-Kill Systems

o   Soft-Kill Systems

  • Active Protection System Market, By Platform:

o   Land-based

o   Airborne

o   Marine

  • Active Protection System Market, By Region:

o   Asia-Pacific

§  China

§  India

§  Japan

§  Indonesia

§  Thailand

§  South Korea

§  Australia

o   Europe & CIS

§  Germany

§  Spain

§  France

§  Russia

§  Italy

§  United Kingdom

§  Belgium

o   North America

§  United States

§  Canada

§  Mexico

o   South America

§  Brazil

§  Argentina

§  Colombia

o   Middle East & Africa

§  South Africa

§  Turkey

§  Saudi Arabia

§  UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Active Protection System Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Active Protection System market report with the given market data, Tech Sci Research offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

Global Active Protection System Market is an upcoming report to be released soon. If you wish an early delivery of this report or want to confirm the date of release, please contact us at [email protected] 

Table of content

1.    Introduction

1.1.  Product Overview

1.2.  Key Highlights of the Report

1.3.  Market Coverage

1.4.  Market Segments Covered

1.5.  Research Tenure Considered

2.    Research Methodology

2.1.  Objective of the Study

2.2.  Baseline Methodology

2.3.  Key Industry Partners

2.4.  Major Association and Secondary Sources

2.5.  Forecasting Methodology

2.6.  Data Triangulation & Validation

2.7.  Assumptions and Limitations

3.    Executive Summary

3.1.  Market Overview

3.2.  Market Forecast

3.3.  Key Regions

3.4.  Key Segments

4.    Impact of COVID-19 on Global Active Protection System Market

5.    Global Active Protection System Market Outlook

5.1.  Market Size & Forecast

5.1.1.    By Value

5.2.  Market Share & Forecast

5.2.1.    By Type Market Share Analysis (Hard-Kill Systems, Soft-Kill Systems)

5.2.2.    By Platform Market Share Analysis (Land-Based, Airborne, Marine)

5.2.3.    By Regional Market Share Analysis

5.2.3.1.        Asia-Pacific Market Share Analysis

5.2.3.2.        Europe & CIS Market Share Analysis

5.2.3.3.        North America Market Share Analysis

5.2.3.4.        South America Market Share Analysis

5.2.3.5.        Middle East & Africa Market Share Analysis

5.2.4.    By Company Market Share Analysis (Top 5 Companies, Others - By Value, 2022)

5.3.  Global Active Protection System Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

5.3.1.    By Type Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

5.3.2.    By Platform Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

5.3.3.    By Regional Market Mapping & Opportunity Assessment

6.    Asia-Pacific Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.1.  Market Size & Forecast

6.1.1.    By Value  

6.2.  Market Share & Forecast

6.2.1.    By Type Market Share Analysis

6.2.2.    By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.    By Country Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.1.        China Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.2.        India Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.3.        Japan Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.4.        Indonesia Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.5.        Thailand Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.6.        South Korea Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.7.        Australia Market Share Analysis

6.2.3.8.        Rest of Asia-Pacific Market Share Analysis

6.3.  Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis

6.3.1.    China Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.1.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.1.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.1.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.1.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.1.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.2.    India Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.2.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.2.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.2.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.2.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.2.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.3.    Japan Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.3.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.3.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.3.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.3.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.3.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.4.    Indonesia Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.4.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.4.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.4.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.4.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.4.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.5.    Thailand Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.5.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.5.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.5.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.5.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.5.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.6.    South Korea Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.6.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.6.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.6.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.6.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.6.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

6.3.7.    Australia Active Protection System Market Outlook

6.3.7.1.        Market Size & Forecast

6.3.7.1.1.           By Value  

6.3.7.2.        Market Share & Forecast

6.3.7.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

6.3.7.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.    Europe & CIS Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.1.  Market Size & Forecast

7.1.1.    By Value  

7.2.  Market Share & Forecast

7.2.1.    By Type Market Share Analysis

7.2.2.    By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.    By Country Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.1.        Germany Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.2.        Spain Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.3.        France Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.4.        Russia Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.5.        Italy Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.6.        United Kingdom Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.7.        Belgium Market Share Analysis

7.2.3.8.        Rest of Europe & CIS Market Share Analysis

7.3.  Europe & CIS: Country Analysis

7.3.1.    Germany Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.1.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.1.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.1.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.1.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.1.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.2.    Spain Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.2.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.2.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.2.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.2.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.2.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.3.    France Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.3.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.3.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.3.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.3.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.3.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.4.    Russia Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.4.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.4.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.4.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.4.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.4.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.5.    Italy Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.5.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.5.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.5.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.5.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.5.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.6.    United Kingdom Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.6.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.6.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.6.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.6.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.6.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

7.3.7.    Belgium Active Protection System Market Outlook

7.3.7.1.        Market Size & Forecast

7.3.7.1.1.           By Value  

7.3.7.2.        Market Share & Forecast

7.3.7.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

7.3.7.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

8.    North America Active Protection System Market Outlook

8.1.  Market Size & Forecast

8.1.1.    By Value  

8.2.  Market Share & Forecast

8.2.1.    By Type Market Share Analysis

8.2.2.    By Platform Market Share Analysis

8.2.3.    By Country Market Share Analysis

8.2.3.1.        United States Market Share Analysis

8.2.3.2.        Mexico Market Share Analysis

8.2.3.3.        Canada Market Share Analysis

8.3.  North America: Country Analysis

8.3.1.    United States Active Protection System Market Outlook

8.3.1.1.        Market Size & Forecast

8.3.1.1.1.           By Value  

8.3.1.2.        Market Share & Forecast

8.3.1.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

8.3.1.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

8.3.2.    Mexico Active Protection System Market Outlook

8.3.2.1.        Market Size & Forecast

8.3.2.1.1.           By Value  

8.3.2.2.        Market Share & Forecast

8.3.2.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

8.3.2.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

8.3.3.    Canada Active Protection System Market Outlook

8.3.3.1.        Market Size & Forecast

8.3.3.1.1.           By Value  

8.3.3.2.        Market Share & Forecast

8.3.3.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

8.3.3.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

9.    South America Active Protection System Market Outlook

9.1.  Market Size & Forecast

9.1.1.    By Value  

9.2.  Market Share & Forecast

9.2.1.    By Type Market Share Analysis

9.2.2.    By Platform Market Share Analysis

9.2.3.    By Country Market Share Analysis

9.2.3.1.        Brazil Market Share Analysis

9.2.3.2.        Argentina Market Share Analysis

9.2.3.3.        Colombia Market Share Analysis

9.2.3.4.        Rest of South America Market Share Analysis

9.3.  South America: Country Analysis

9.3.1.    Brazil Active Protection System Market Outlook

9.3.1.1.        Market Size & Forecast

9.3.1.1.1.           By Value  

9.3.1.2.        Market Share & Forecast

9.3.1.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

9.3.1.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

9.3.2.    Colombia Active Protection System Market Outlook

9.3.2.1.        Market Size & Forecast

9.3.2.1.1.           By Value  

9.3.2.2.        Market Share & Forecast

9.3.2.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

9.3.2.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

9.3.3.    Argentina Active Protection System Market Outlook

9.3.3.1.        Market Size & Forecast

9.3.3.1.1.           By Value  

9.3.3.2.        Market Share & Forecast

9.3.3.2.1.           By Type Market Share Analysis

9.3.3.2.2.           By Platform Market Share Analysis

10.  Middle East & Africa Active Protection System Market Outlook

10.1.            Market Size & Forecast

10.1.1. By Value   

10.2.            Market Share & Forecast

10.2.1. By Type Market Share Analysis

10.2.2. By Platform Market Share Analysis

10.2.3. By Country Market Share Analysis

10.2.3.1.     South Africa Market Share Analysis

10.2.3.2.     Turkey Market Share Analysis

10.2.3.3.     Saudi Arabia Market Share Analysis

10.2.3.4.     UAE Market Share Analysis

10.2.3.5.     Rest of Middle East & Africa Market Share Africa

10.3.            Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis

10.3.1. South Africa Active Protection System Market Outlook

10.3.1.1.     Market Size & Forecast

10.3.1.1.1.         By Value  

10.3.1.2.     Market Share & Forecast

10.3.1.2.1.         By Type Market Share Analysis

10.3.1.2.2.         By Platform Market Share Analysis

10.3.2. Turkey Active Protection System Market Outlook

10.3.2.1.     Market Size & Forecast

10.3.2.1.1.         By Value  

10.3.2.2.     Market Share & Forecast

10.3.2.2.1.         By Type Market Share Analysis

10.3.2.2.2.         By Platform Market Share Analysis

10.3.3. Saudi Arabia Active Protection System Market Outlook

10.3.3.1.     Market Size & Forecast

10.3.3.1.1.         By Value  

10.3.3.2.     Market Share & Forecast

10.3.3.2.1.         By Type Market Share Analysis

10.3.3.2.2.         By Platform Market Share Analysis

10.3.4. UAE Active Protection System Market Outlook

10.3.4.1.     Market Size & Forecast

10.3.4.1.1.         By Value  

10.3.4.2.     Market Share & Forecast

10.3.4.2.1.         By Type Market Share Analysis

10.3.4.2.2.         By Platform Market Share Analysis

11.  SWOT Analysis

11.1.            Strength

11.2.            Weakness

11.3.            Opportunities

11.4.            Threats

12.  Market Dynamics

12.1.            Market Drivers

12.2.            Market Challenges

13.  Market Trends and Developments

14.  Competitive Landscape

14.1.            Company Profiles (Up to 10 Major Companies)

14.1.1. Artis LLC

14.1.1.1.     Company Details

14.1.1.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.1.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.1.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.1.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.2. Aselsan AS..

14.1.2.1.     Company Details

14.1.2.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.2.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.2.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.2.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.3. Hensoldt AG.

14.1.3.1.     Company Details

14.1.3.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.3.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.3.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.3.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.4. Krauss-Maffei Wegmann GmbH & Co. KG.

14.1.4.1.     Company Details

14.1.4.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.4.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.4.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.4.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.5. Lockheed Martin Corporation.

14.1.5.1.     Company Details

14.1.5.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.5.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.5.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.5.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.6. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd

14.1.6.1.     Company Details

14.1.6.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.6.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.6.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.6.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.7. Raytheon Technologies Corporation

14.1.7.1.     Company Details

14.1.7.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.7.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.7.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.7.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.8. Rheinmetall AG.

14.1.8.1.     Company Details

14.1.8.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.8.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.8.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.8.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.9. SAAB AB.

14.1.9.1.     Company Details

14.1.9.2.     Key Product Offered

14.1.9.3.     Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.9.4.     Recent Developments

14.1.9.5.     Key Management Personnel

14.1.10.              Israel Military Industries Ltd.

14.1.10.1.  Company Details

14.1.10.2.  Key Product Offered

14.1.10.3.  Financials (As Per Availability)

14.1.10.4.  Recent Developments

14.1.10.5.  Key Management Personnel

15.  Strategic Recommendations

15.1.            Key Focus Areas

15.1.1. Target Regions

15.1.2. Target Type

15.1.3. Target By Platform

16.  About Us & Disclaimer

Figures and Tables

Frequently asked questions

down-arrow

The market size of the Global Active Protection System Market was estimated to be USD 3 billion in 2022.

down-arrow

Land-based, aerial, and marine are the three segments of the global market for active protection systems according to platform. With the biggest share, the land-based segment is predicted to grow significantly over the projection period. The strong demand for APS on land-based platforms and the rapid advancement of technology in soft-kill systems are credited with the growth. A few examples include smoke dispensers combined with electronic and laser-based jamming. With the second-largest share, the marine segment is expected to grow at a commendable rate.

down-arrow

The global market was dominated by North America. The U.S. Armed Forces developed platform self-protection systems like MAPS, Quick Kill, Iron Curtain, and Directed Energy Weapons to protect its platforms, personnel, and increase situational awareness from both known and unknown threats in response to the growing threat posed by antitank guided missiles and loitering munitions. Europe, which held the second-largest share in 2021, is expected to grow at a commendable rate over the coming years. Due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and their traditional procurement programs, European Union members have increased their investment in next-generation self-protection systems for their armed forces platforms.

down-arrow

Growing Threat Landscape, Advancements in APS Technology, and Operational Effectiveness and Mission Success are the major drivers for the Global Active Protection System Market

Related Reports

profile

Srishti Verma

Business Consultant
Press Release

Active Protection System Market to Grow with a CAGR of 6.09% Globally through to 2028

Jan, 2024

Growing Threat Landscape, Advancements in APS Technology, and Operational Effectiveness and Mission Success are factors driving the Global Active Protection System market in the forecast period 2024-

Why Choose Us